Cited by 7Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Does Compulsory Admission Prevent Inpatient Suicide Among Patients with Schizophrenia? A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan

Lin, Ching‐En, Chung, Chi‐Hsiang, Chen, Li‐Fen, Chien, Wu‐Chien·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of inpatient suicide in patients with schizophrenia during 2007–2013 and to determine putative risk factors. Methods: We conducted a national population‐based cohort study of 2,038 psychiatric inpatients in their first compulsory admission, matched with 8,152 controls who were voluntary inpatients. Only patients with schizophrenia were included in the study. We used data derived from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Database 2005, comprising 1 million beneficiaries randomly selected from the entire population of Taiwan. Results: During the follow‐up period, 23 and 75 inpatient suicides were observed in the compulsory and control groups, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the cumulative incidence rate of inpatient suicide was not significantly different between compulsory and voluntary admissions (log‐rank test, p = .206). Conclusions: Our results suggest that compulsory admission has no protective effects on risk reduction of inpatient suicide for patients with schizophrenia who are compulsorily admitted compared with voluntarily admitted controls. Clinicians should be more alert for the prevention of inpatient suicide among patients with schizophrenia and consider the close monitoring of inpatient suicide risk in the first week of admission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12497

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five studies found an increased risk of suicide for people admitted involuntarily.

    “However, five studies found an increased risk of suicide for people admitted involuntarily (98–102), and one study found that involuntary admission was associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality (with no deaths attributable to suicide in either group) (103).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C., Chung, C., Chen, L., & Chien, W.
Affiliations
  • Tzu Chi University (TW)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chien, Wu‐Chien
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-06
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
966-979
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2885284425
Cited by
7
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan (TCRD-TPE-107-03)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-C107-004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
inpatient suicide, schizophrenia, involuntary admission, involuntary psychiatric admission, voluntary admission, suicide risk factors, suicide prevention, psychiatric inpatients, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Involuntary Treatment, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Suicide, Taiwan, Cohort Studies, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review