Cited by 195Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Blood flow restricted and traditional resistance training performed to fatigue produce equal muscle hypertrophy

Farup, J., de Paoli, F., Bjerg, K., Riis, S., Ringgard, S., Vissing, K.·2015·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

This study investigated the hypertrophic potential of load‐matched blood‐flow restricted resistance training ( BFR ) vs free‐flow traditional resistance training (low‐load TRT ) performed to fatigue. Ten healthy young subjects performed unilateral BFR and contralateral low‐load TRT elbow flexor dumbbell curl with 40% of one repetition maximum until volitional concentric failure 3 days per week for 6 weeks. Prior to and at 3 (post‐3) and 10 (post‐10) days post‐training, magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) was used to estimate elbow flexor muscle volume and muscle water content accumulation through training. Acute changes in muscle thickness following an early vs a late exercise bout were measured with ultrasound to determine muscle swelling during the immediate 0–48 h post‐exercise. Total work was threefold lower for BFR compared with low‐load TRT ( P < 0.001). Both BRF and low‐load TRT increased muscle volume by approximately 12% at post‐3 and post‐10 ( P < 0.01) with no changes in MRI ‐determined water content. Training increased muscle thickness during the immediate 48 h post‐exercise ( P < 0.001) and to greater extent with BRF ( P < 0.05) in the early training phase. In conclusion, BFR and low‐load TRT , when performed to fatigue, produce equal muscle hypertrophy, which may partly rely on transient exercise‐induced increases in muscle water content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.12396

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farup, J., de Paoli, F., Bjerg, K., Riis, S., Ringgard, S., & Vissing, K.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Department of Biomedicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Vissing, K.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
754-763
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W1713489898
Cited by
195
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7
FWCI
36.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gigtforeningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
blood flow restriction, resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, low-load resistance training, muscle fatigue, elbow flexors, muscle volume, muscle water content, muscle swelling, exercise-induced muscle damage
MeSH terms
Adult, Arm, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Regional Blood Flow, Ultrasonography, Water, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fatigue, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Myalgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review