Cited by 68Decolonial Thought and EpistemologiesContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeFeminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Advancing a sociology of ignorance in the study of racism and racial non‐knowing

Mueller, Jennifer C.·2018·Sociology Compass

Abstract

By a wealth of indicators, ignorance appears a bona fide if often vexing social fact. Ignorance is socially constructed, negotiated, and pervasive; ignorance is often socially inevitable, even necessary; and, without a doubt, ignorance is socially consequential. Yet, despite its significance, ignorance has appeared a largely secondary concern among sociologists. Perhaps more perplexing, while sociologists of racism, power, and domination have long focused on the ways racial ideologies distort and mystify racial understanding to sustain White supremacy over time, we have done less to elaborate ignorance than is possible and warranted. Here, I join growing calls for a fully‐fledged “sociology of ignorance” and argue that antiracist and decolonial scholars have much to gain from and contribute to such an endeavor. This article traces the historical forebears of a “sociology of ignorance” and explores ignorance as a social concept before turning to examine precedents and increasing attention to ignorance scholarship on racism, racial domination, and racialized non‐knowing. Drawing from this work, I urge race‐critical scholars take advantage of our unique position to advance theory and methodology surrounding ignorance and the social‐cultural production of non‐knowledge as a broader area of social inquiry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/soc4.12600

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.

    “This theoretical perspective conceptually builds upon the epistemologies of ignorance framework,37–40 wherein ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, J. C.
Affiliations
Skidmore College (US)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Jennifer C.
Venue
Sociology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
12
Issue
8
ISSN
1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884270748
Cited by
68
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Keywords
sociology of ignorance, ignorance, racism, racial domination, white supremacy, racial ideology, decolonial scholarship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review