The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review
Open accessAbstract
Digital technologies are being developed and adopted across the agro‐food system, from farm to fork. Within decision‐making spaces, however, little attention is being paid to political factors arising from such technological developments. This review draws from critical social sciences to examine emerging technologies and big data systems in agriculture and assesses some key issues arising in the field. We begin with an introduction and review of the so‐called ‘digital revolution’ and then briefly outline how political economy is effective for understanding major challenges for governing technologies and data systems in agriculture. These challenges include: (1) data ownership and control, (2) the production of technologies and data development, and (3) data security. We then use literature and examples to consider the extent to which the political and economic landscape can be shifted to support greater equity in agriculture, while reflecting on structural challenges and limits. In doing so, we emphasise that while there are significant systemic tensions between digital ag‐tech development and agroecological approaches, we do not see them as mutually exclusive per se. This article intends to provide decision‐makers, practitioners and scholars from a wide range of disciplines with a timely assessment of agro‐food digitalisation that attends to political economic factors. In doing so, this article contributes to policy and decision‐making discussions, which, from our perspective, continue to be rather technocentric in nature while paying little attention to how digital technologies can support agroecological systems specifically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Big Data in Smart Farming – A review
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 · Cited by 3,378
Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts
Kitchin, R. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714528481 · Cited by 2,355
Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence
Pretty, J. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163 · Cited by 1,941
Precision Agriculture and Food Security
Gebbers, R., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183899 · Cited by 1,595
Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems
Gliessman, S. R. (2007) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,061
Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems
Francis, C., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S., Breland, T. A., Creamer, N., Harwood, R., Salomonsson, L., Helenius, J., Rickerl, D., Salvador, R., et al. (2003) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1300/j064v22n03_10 · Cited by 975
Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique
Lyon, D. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714541861 · Cited by 839
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
Taylor, L. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717736335 · Cited by 802
Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2006) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi006 · Cited by 700
Bock, B. B. (2016) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/soru.12119 · Cited by 504
Cited by
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · Cited by 1,307
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system
Clapp, J. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00297-7 · Cited by 359
Clapp, J., & Ruder, S.-L. (2020) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00566 · Cited by 251
MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., & Helming, K. (2022) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J., Dara, R., Mosby, I., Reed, M., & Fraser, E. D. G.
- Venue
- Sociologia Ruralis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-229
- ISSN
- 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9523
- OpenAlex
- W2912281700
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 75.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/soru.12233
- The paper
- Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J., Dara, R., Mosby, I., Reed, M., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2019). The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.