The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common, intermediate and well‐documented HLA alleles in world populations: CIWD version 3.0.0
Open accessAbstract
A catalog of common, intermediate and well‐documented (CIWD) HLA‐A, ‐B, ‐C, ‐DRB1, ‐DRB3, ‐DRB4, ‐DRB5, ‐DQB1 and ‐DPB1 alleles has been compiled from over 8 million individuals using data from 20 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell volunteer donor registries. Individuals are divided into seven geographic/ancestral/ethnic groups and data are summarized for each group and for the total population. P (two‐field) and G group assignments are divided into one of four frequency categories: common (≥1 in 10 000), intermediate (≥1 in 100 000), well‐documented (≥5 occurrences) or not‐CIWD. Overall 26% of alleles in IPD‐IMGT/HLA version 3.31.0 at P group resolution fall into the three CIWD categories. The two‐field catalog includes 18% (n = 545) common, 17% (n = 513) intermediate, and 65% (n = 1997) well‐documented alleles. Full‐field allele frequency data are provided but are limited in value by the variations in resolution used by the registries. A recommended CIWD list is based on the most frequent category in the total or any of the seven geographic/ancestral/ethnic groups. Data are also provided so users can compile a catalog specific to the population groups that they serve. Comparisons are made to three previous CWD reports representing more limited population groups. This catalog, CIWD version 3.0.0, is a step closer to the collection of global HLA frequencies and to a clearer view of HLA diversity in the human population as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation
Neefjes, J., Jongsma, M. L. M., Paul, P., & Bakke, O. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3084 · Cited by 2,044
The MHC locus and genetic susceptibility to autoimmune and infectious diseases
Matzaraki, V., Kumar, V., Wijmenga, C., & Zhernakova, A. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1207-1 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurley, C. K., Kempenich, J., Wadsworth, K., Sauter, J., Hofmann, J. A., Schefzyk, D., Schmidt, A. H., Galarza, P., Cardozo, M. B. R., Dudkiewicz, M., Houdova, L., Jindra, P., Sorensen, B. S., Jagannathan, L., Mathur, A., Linjama, T., Torosian, T., Freudenberger, R., Manolis, A., Mavrommatis, J., Cereb, N., Manor, S., Shriki, N., Sacchi, N., Ameen, R., Fisher, R., Dunckley, H., Andersen, I., Alaskar, A., Alzahrani, M., Hajeer, A., Jawdat, D., Nicoloso, G., Kupatawintu, P., Cho, L., Kaur, A., Bengtsson, M., & Dehn, J.
- Venue
- HLA
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-31
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 516-531
- ISSN
- 2059-2302 (ISSN-L)
- 2059-2310
- OpenAlex
- W3002566805
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common, intermediate and well‐documented HLA alleles in world populations: CIWD version 3.0.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tan.13811
- The paper
- Hurley, C. K., Kempenich, J., Wadsworth, K., Sauter, J., Hofmann, J. A., Schefzyk, D., Schmidt, A. H., Galarza, P., Cardozo, M. B. R., Dudkiewicz, M., Houdova, L., Jindra, P., Sorensen, B. S., Jagannathan, L., Mathur, A., Linjama, T., Torosian, T., Freudenberger, R., Manolis, A., . . . Dehn, J. (2020). Common, intermediate and well‐documented HLA alleles in world populations: CIWD version 3.0.0. HLA. https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.13811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
