Cited by 2Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationEducational Technology in Learning

Survey of medical students' use of social media

Ahmed, Hamza, Soorma, Talha, Nawab, Fuzail, Ahmed, Saad, Khan, Omeair·2016·The Clinical Teacher

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tct.12544

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, H., Soorma, T., Nawab, F., Ahmed, S., & Khan, O.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Hamza
Venue
The Clinical Teacher
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
392-392
ISSN
  • 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-498X
OpenAlex
W3146856120
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
social media, medical students, social media use, medical education
MeSH terms
Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review