Cited by 20Child Nutrition and Water AccessFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsHealth and Conflict Studies

Gender and age disparities in adult undernutrition in northern Uganda: high‐risk groups not targeted by food aid programmes

Schramm, Stine, Kaducu, Felix Ocaka, Smedemark, Siri Aas, Ovuga, Emilio, Sodemann, Morten·2016·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Objective To determine the prevalence of adult malnutrition and associated risk factors in a post-conflict area of northern Uganda. Methods A cross-sectional community survey was performed from September 2011 to June 2013. All registered residents in Gulu Health and Demographic Surveillance System aged 15 years and older were considered eligible. Trained field assistants collected anthropometric measurements (weight and height) and administered questionnaires with information on sociodemographic characteristics, food security, smoking and alcohol. Nutritional status was classified by body mass index. Results In total, 2062 men and 2924 women participated and were included in the analyses. The prevalence of underweight was 22.3% for men and 16.0% for women, whereas the prevalence of overweight was 1.5% for men and 7.6% for women. In men, underweight was associated with younger (15-19 years) and older age (>55 years) (P Conclusions Our findings are not in line with the conventional target groups in nutritional programmes and highlight the importance of continuous health and nutritional assessments of all population groups that reflect local social determinants and family structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tmi.12708

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Schramm, S., Kaducu, F. O., Smedemark, S. A., Ovuga, E., & Sodemann, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Gulu University (UG)
Corresponding author
Schramm, Stine
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-16
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
807-817
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2340875275
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • Danida Fellowship Centre
  • Syddansk Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
underweight, overweight, gender disparities, age disparities, Northern Uganda, food aid targeting, risk factors, smoking, food security, marital status, rainy season, social determinants of nutrition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Risk Factors, Seasons, Sex Factors, Smoking, Thinness, Uganda, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Marital Status, Malnutrition, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult, Food Assistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review