Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Arabidopsis vacuolar sugar transporter SWEET 2 limits carbon sequestration from roots and restricts Pythium infection

Open access
Chen, Hsin‐Yi, Huh, Jung‐Hyun, Yu, Ya‐Chi, Ho, Li‐Hsuan, Chen, Li‐Qing, Tholl, Dorothea, Frommer, Wolf B., Guo, Woei‐Jiun·2015·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Plant roots secrete a significant portion of their assimilated carbon into the rhizosphere. The putative sugar transporter SWEET 2 is highly expressed in Arabidopsis roots. Expression patterns of SWEET 2–β‐glucuronidase fusions confirmed that SWEET 2 accumulates highly in root cells and thus may contribute to sugar secretion, specifically from epidermal cells of the root apex. SWEET 2–green fluorescent protein fusions localized to the tonoplast, which engulfs the major sugar storage compartment. Functional analysis of SWEET 2 activity in yeast showed low uptake activity for the glucose analog 2‐deoxyglucose, consistent with a role in the transport of glucose across the tonoplast. Loss‐of‐function sweet2 mutants showed reduced tolerance to excess glucose, lower glucose accumulation in leaves, and 15–25% higher glucose‐derived carbon efflux from roots, suggesting that SWEET 2 has a role in preventing the loss of sugar from root tissue. SWEET2 root expression was induced more than 10‐fold during Pythium infection. Importantly, sweet2 mutants were more susceptible to the oomycete, showing impaired growth after infection. We propose that root‐expressed vacuolar SWEET 2 modulates sugar secretion, possibly by reducing the availability of glucose sequestered in the vacuole, thereby limiting carbon loss to the rhizosphere. Moreover, the reduced availability of sugar in the rhizosphere due to SWEET 2 activity contributes to resistance to Pythium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.12948

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H., Huh, J., Yu, Y., Ho, L., Chen, L., Tholl, D., Frommer, W. B., & Guo, W.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
1046-1058
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2169253172
Cited by
238
References
2
FWCI
19.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Arabidopsis vacuolar sugar transporter SWEET 2 limits carbon sequestration from roots and restricts Pythium infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.12948
The paper
Chen, H., Huh, J., Yu, Y., Ho, L., Chen, L., Tholl, D., Frommer, W. B., & Guo, W. (2015). The Arabidopsis vacuolar sugar transporter SWEET 2 limits carbon sequestration from roots and restricts Pythium infection. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.