The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Concentrations of ground‐level ozone ([O 3]) over much of the Earth's land surface have more than doubled since pre‐industrial times. The air pollutant is highly variable over time and space, which makes it difficult to assess the average agronomic and economic impacts of the pollutant as well as to breed crops for O 3 tolerance. Recent modeling efforts have improved quantitative understanding of the effects of current and future [O 3] on global crop productivity, and experimental advances have improved understanding of the cellular O 3 sensing, signaling and response mechanisms. This work provides the fundamental background and justification for breeding and biotechnological approaches for improving O 3 tolerance in crops. There is considerable within‐species variation in O 3 tolerance in crops, which has been used to create mapping populations for screening. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for O 3 tolerance have been identified in model and crop species, and although none has been cloned to date, transcript profiling experiments have identified candidate genes associated with QTL. Biotechnological strategies for improving O 3 tolerance are also being tested, although there is considerable research to be done before O 3‐tolerant germplasm is available to growers for most crops. Strategies to improve O 3 tolerance in crops have been hampered by the lack of translation of laboratory experiments to the field, and the lack of correlation between visual leaf‐level O 3 damage and yield loss to O 3 stress. Future efforts to screen mapping populations in the field and to identify more promising phenotypes for O 3 tolerance are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002952 · Cited by 1,942 · cited 1×
“When this O3 map is overlaid with global cropland coverage (Ramankutty et al., 2008), it is clear that croplands in China, India and the USA are exposed to much higher concentrations of O3 than croplands in Australia or Brazil (Figure 1).”
Background
Cited by
McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., & Martin, R. V. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020 · Cited by 714
Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Oksanen, E., Sicard, P., Wang, Q., Saitanis, C. J., Araminiene, V., Blande, J. D., Hayes, F., Calatayud, V., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc1176 · Cited by 382
Ozone pollution threatens the production of major staple crops in East Asia
Feng, Z., Xu, Y., Kobayashi, K., Dai, L., Zhang, T., Agathokleous, E., Calatayud, V., Paoletti, E., Mukherjee, A., Agrawal, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00422-6 · Cited by 322
Abhinandan, K., Skori, L., Stanic, M., Hickerson, N. M. N., Jamshed, M., & Samuel, M. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00734 · Cited by 252
Plants have different strategies to defend against air pollutants
Oksanen, E., & Kontunen-Soppela, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2020.10.010 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Ainsworth, E. A.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10-14
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 886-897
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2530006302
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.13298
- The paper
- Ainsworth, E. A. (2017). Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.