Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution

Open access
Ainsworth, Elizabeth A.·2017·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Concentrations of ground‐level ozone ([O 3]) over much of the Earth's land surface have more than doubled since pre‐industrial times. The air pollutant is highly variable over time and space, which makes it difficult to assess the average agronomic and economic impacts of the pollutant as well as to breed crops for O 3 tolerance. Recent modeling efforts have improved quantitative understanding of the effects of current and future [O 3] on global crop productivity, and experimental advances have improved understanding of the cellular O 3 sensing, signaling and response mechanisms. This work provides the fundamental background and justification for breeding and biotechnological approaches for improving O 3 tolerance in crops. There is considerable within‐species variation in O 3 tolerance in crops, which has been used to create mapping populations for screening. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for O 3 tolerance have been identified in model and crop species, and although none has been cloned to date, transcript profiling experiments have identified candidate genes associated with QTL. Biotechnological strategies for improving O 3 tolerance are also being tested, although there is considerable research to be done before O 3‐tolerant germplasm is available to growers for most crops. Strategies to improve O 3 tolerance in crops have been hampered by the lack of translation of laboratory experiments to the field, and the lack of correlation between visual leaf‐level O 3 damage and yield loss to O 3 stress. Future efforts to screen mapping populations in the field and to identify more promising phenotypes for O 3 tolerance are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.13298

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Ainsworth, E. A.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-14
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
886-897
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2530006302
Cited by
392
References
1
FWCI
20.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.13298
The paper
Ainsworth, E. A. (2017). Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.