The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop genome‐wide association study: a harvest of biological relevance
Abstract
Summary: With the advent of rapid genotyping and next‐generation sequencing technologies, genome‐wide association study (GWAS) has become a routine strategy for decoding genotype–phenotype associations in many species. More than 1000 such studies over the last decade have revealed substantial genotype–phenotype associations in crops and provided unparalleled opportunities to probe functional genomics. Beyond the many ‘hits’ obtained, this review summarizes recent efforts to increase our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits by focusing on non‐main effects including epistasis, pleiotropy, and phenotypic plasticity. We also discuss how these achievements and the remaining gaps in our knowledge will guide future studies. Synthetic association is highlighted as leading to false causality, which is prevalent but largely underestimated. Furthermore, validation evidence is appealing for future GWAS, especially in the context of emerging genome‐editing technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Rare and common variants: twenty arguments
Gibson, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3118 · Cited by 1,278
Rare Variants Create Synthetic Genome-Wide Associations
Dickson, S. P., Wang, K., Krantz, I., Hakonarson, H., & Goldstein, D. B. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000294 · Cited by 857
Statistical methods to detect pleiotropy in human complex traits
Hackinger, S., & Zeggini, E. (2017) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.170125 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Napier, J. D., Heckman, R. W., & Juenger, T. E. (2023) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac322 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., & Yan, J.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-17
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-18
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2898232071
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop genome‐wide association study: a harvest of biological relevance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.14139
- The paper
- Liu, H., & Yan, J. (2019). Crop genome‐wide association study: a harvest of biological relevance. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.