Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)

Open access
Lonardi, Stefano, Muñoz‐Amatriaín, María, Liang, Qihua, Shu, Shengqiang, Wanamaker, Steve I., Lo, Sassoum, Tanskanen, Jaakko, Schulman, Alan H., Zhu, Tingting, Luo, Ming‐Cheng, Alhakami, Hind, Ounit, Rachid, Hasan, Abid Md., Verdier, Jerome, Roberts, Philip A., Santos, Jansen R.P., Ndeve, Arsenio, Doležel, Jaroslav, Vrána, Jan, Hokin, Samuel A., Farmer, Andrew D., Cannon, Steven B., Close, Timothy J.·2019·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) is a major crop for worldwide food and nutritional security, especially in sub‐Saharan Africa, that is resilient to hot and drought‐prone environments. An assembly of the single‐haplotype inbred genome of cowpea IT97K‐499‐35 was developed by exploiting the synergies between single‐molecule real‐time sequencing, optical and genetic mapping, and an assembly reconciliation algorithm. A total of 519 Mb is included in the assembled sequences. Nearly half of the assembled sequence is composed of repetitive elements, which are enriched within recombination‐poor pericentromeric regions. A comparative analysis of these elements suggests that genome size differences between Vigna species are mainly attributable to changes in the amount of Gypsy retrotransposons. Conversely, genes are more abundant in more distal, high‐recombination regions of the chromosomes; there appears to be more duplication of genes within the NBS‐LRR and the SAUR‐like auxin superfamilies compared with other warm‐season legumes that have been sequenced. A surprising outcome is the identification of an inversion of 4.2 Mb among landraces and cultivars, which includes a gene that has been associated in other plants with interactions with the parasitic weed Striga gesnerioides . The genome sequence facilitated the identification of a putative syntelog for multiple organ gigantism in legumes. A revised numbering system has been adopted for cowpea chromosomes based on synteny with common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ). An estimate of nuclear genome size of 640.6 Mbp based on cytometry is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.14349

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Lonardi, S., Muñoz‐Amatriaín, M., Liang, Q., Shu, S., Wanamaker, S. I., Lo, S., Tanskanen, J., Schulman, A. H., Zhu, T., Luo, M., Alhakami, H., Ounit, R., Hasan, A. M., Verdier, J., Roberts, P. A., Santos, J. R. P., Ndeve, A., Doležel, J., Vrána, J., Hokin, S. A., Farmer, A. D., Cannon, S. B., & Close, T. J.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
98
Issue
5
Pages
767-782
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2952059076
Cited by
369
References
79
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.14349
The paper
Lonardi, S., Muñoz‐Amatriaín, M., Liang, Q., Shu, S., Wanamaker, S. I., Lo, S., Tanskanen, J., Schulman, A. H., Zhu, T., Luo, M., Alhakami, H., Ounit, R., Hasan, A. M., Verdier, J., Roberts, P. A., Santos, J. R. P., Ndeve, A., Doležel, J., Vrána, J., . . . Close, T. J. (2019). The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.