The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) is a major crop for worldwide food and nutritional security, especially in sub‐Saharan Africa, that is resilient to hot and drought‐prone environments. An assembly of the single‐haplotype inbred genome of cowpea IT97K‐499‐35 was developed by exploiting the synergies between single‐molecule real‐time sequencing, optical and genetic mapping, and an assembly reconciliation algorithm. A total of 519 Mb is included in the assembled sequences. Nearly half of the assembled sequence is composed of repetitive elements, which are enriched within recombination‐poor pericentromeric regions. A comparative analysis of these elements suggests that genome size differences between Vigna species are mainly attributable to changes in the amount of Gypsy retrotransposons. Conversely, genes are more abundant in more distal, high‐recombination regions of the chromosomes; there appears to be more duplication of genes within the NBS‐LRR and the SAUR‐like auxin superfamilies compared with other warm‐season legumes that have been sequenced. A surprising outcome is the identification of an inversion of 4.2 Mb among landraces and cultivars, which includes a gene that has been associated in other plants with interactions with the parasitic weed Striga gesnerioides . The genome sequence facilitated the identification of a putative syntelog for multiple organ gigantism in legumes. A revised numbering system has been adopted for cowpea chromosomes based on synteny with common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ). An estimate of nuclear genome size of 640.6 Mbp based on cytometry is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 · Cited by 13,344
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S. J., & Marra, M. A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109 · Cited by 10,964
Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k -mer weighting and repeat separation
Koren, S., Walenz, B. P., Berlin, K., Miller, J. R., Bergman, N. H., & Phillippy, A. M. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.215087.116 · Cited by 7,304
A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., & Rougemont, J. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802429642 · Cited by 7,028
Accelerated Profile HMM Searches
Eddy, S. R. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · Cited by 6,975
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly con*gs with BWA-MEM
Li, H. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.963153.v1 · Cited by 4,932
Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean
Schmutz, J., Cannon, S. B., Schlueter, J., Ma, J., Mitros, T., Nelson, W., Hyten, D. L., Song, Q., Thelen, J. J., Cheng, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08670 · Cited by 4,463
Self-citation
Cited by
Olanrewaju, O. S., Oyatomi, O., Babalola, O. O., & Abberton, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.798993 · Cited by 55
Evolutionary gain and loss of a plant pattern-recognition receptor for HAMP recognition
Snoeck, S., Abramson, B. W., Garcia, A. G., Egan, A. N., Michael, T. P., & Steinbrenner, A. D. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81050 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Lonardi, S., Muñoz‐Amatriaín, M., Liang, Q., Shu, S., Wanamaker, S. I., Lo, S., Tanskanen, J., Schulman, A. H., Zhu, T., Luo, M., Alhakami, H., Ounit, R., Hasan, A. M., Verdier, J., Roberts, P. A., Santos, J. R. P., Ndeve, A., Doležel, J., Vrána, J., Hokin, S. A., Farmer, A. D., Cannon, S. B., & Close, T. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 767-782
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2952059076
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 28.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.14349
- The paper
- Lonardi, S., Muñoz‐Amatriaín, M., Liang, Q., Shu, S., Wanamaker, S. I., Lo, S., Tanskanen, J., Schulman, A. H., Zhu, T., Luo, M., Alhakami, H., Ounit, R., Hasan, A. M., Verdier, J., Roberts, P. A., Santos, J. R. P., Ndeve, A., Doležel, J., Vrána, J., . . . Close, T. J. (2019). The genome of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.