Cited by 33Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyFoucault, Power, and Ethics

Lockdown under lockdown? Pandemic, the carceral and COVID‐19 in British prisons

Open access
Schliehe, Anna, Philo, Chris, Carlin, Bethany, Fallon, Caitlín, Penna, Giovanni·2022·Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

Abstract

The relationship between pandemic, or chronic infectious diseases, and the carceral, meaning set‐apart spaces of enforced confinement for ‘wrong‐doers,’ has a long, tangled history. It features in Foucault's inquiries into disciplinary power and its associated spatial formations, not least in the shape of the modern prison. Drawing lightly from Foucault's claims about disciplinary and biopolitical power, as well as on his anti‐prison activism, this paper explores three possibilities for penal transformation arising during the early months of COVID‐19 in UK prisons (circa March to August 2020). Consulting primary source material, these possibilities are respectively identified as ‘retrenching,’ ‘reworking’ or ‘reducing’ the carceral. A chief finding is that under the press of pandemic ‘emergency,’ the tilt of emphasis has been towards a retrenched or reworked ‘carceral state,’ disappointing any promise of abolition, let alone more humble reduction in carceral conditions. The ‘biological sub‐citizens’ of prisons are hence being left especially vulnerable to the press of pandemic, in part precisely because of how carceral spatialities are being intensified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tran.12557

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being uncertain about the COVID-19 pandemic led to a 'pandemic fear' that became arduous for the two communities.

    “Being uncertain about the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a 'pandemic fear' that has become arduous for the two communities [69].”

    From Exploring Psychosocial Stressors and Coping Strategies During the COVID‐19 Lockdown: A Study of Two Low‐Income Communities in South Africa (2025) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Introduction reports prison staff expressing fears about COVID-19, and “Applied population geographies” describes prisoners terrified of infection. The paper also discusses vulnerability both inside and outside prisons, but these passages do not establish that uncertainty caused a shared “pandemic fear” that was arduous for the two communities. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography

    Moran, D., Turner, J., & Schliehe, A. K. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517710352 · Cited by 268 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…– or what we call simply the carceral state – is the state at its most coercive: cement and steel bars, cuffs, batons, and an arsenal of weapons held by police, parole officers, and prisons to maintain control over those members of society deemed most in need of containment” (Morrell, 2018, p. 51).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Agamben, G. (1998) Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  2. Agamben, G. (2005) State of exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Barnert, E., Ahalt, C. & Williams, B. (2020) Prisons: Amplifiers of the COVID‐19 pandemic hiding in plain sight. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 964– 966. 32407126 PMC7287517
  4. Brown, E. (2020) A systematic review of the effects of prison segregation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 52, 101389.
  5. Carlin, B. (2020) Examining the boundary between confinement and society: The spaces and practices of prison visiting in HMP Barlinnie. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow.
  6. Cohen, S. & Taylor, L. (1972) Psychological survival: The experience of long‐term imprisonment. London, UK: Penguin.
  7. Crawley, E. (2005) Institutional thoughtlessness in prisons and its impacts on the day‐to‐day prison lives of elderly men. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 350– 363. Availabile from: 10.1177/1043986205282018 · DOI
  8. Crewe, B. (2007) Power, adaptation and resistance in a late‐modern men's prison. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 256– 275.
  9. De Carvalho, S.G., dos Santos, A.B.S. & Santos, I.M. (2020) The pandemic in prison: Interventions and overisolation. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25, 3493– 3502. 32876243
  10. Elden, S. (2017) Foucault: The birth of power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  11. Fallon, C. (2021) An exploration of the porous boundary of carceral geography through prisoner Arts rehabilitation initiatives in Scotland. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow.
  12. Fassin, D. (2009) Another politics of life is possible. Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 44– 60. Availabile from: 10.1177/0263276409106349 · DOI
  13. Foucault, M. (1976) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, UK: Penguin Books.
  14. Foucault, M. (1979) History of sexuality, Vol. 1: The will to knowledge. London, UK: Penguin Books.
  15. Foucault, M. (2007) Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1976–1977. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Foucault, M. (2008) The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Foucault, M. (2015) The punitive society: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1972–1973. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Gilmore, R.W. (2007) Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  19. Haggerty, K.D. & Bucerius, S. (2020) The proliferating pains of imprisonment. Incarceration, 1, 263266632093643. Available from: 10.1177/2632666320936432 · DOI
  20. Maycock, M. (2022) COVID‐19 has caused a dramatic change to prison life: Analysing the impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the pains of imprisonment in the Scottish prison estate. British Journal of Criminology, 62, 218– 233.
  21. Maycock, M. & Dickson, G. (2021) Analysing the views of people in custody about the management of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Scottish prison estate. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 17, 320– 334.
  22. Mbembe, A. (2019) Necropolitics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  23. Moran, D. (2015) Carceral geography: Spaces and practices of incarceration. London, UK: Routledge.
  24. Ogborn, M. (1995) Discipline, government and law: Separate confinement in the prisons of England and Wales, 1830–1877. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 295– 311. Available from: 10.2307/622653. · DOI
  25. Philo, C. (2001) Accumulating populations: Bodies, institutions and space. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 473– 490.
  26. Philo, C. (2012) A ‘new Foucault’ with lively implications – Or ‘the crawfish advances sideways’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 496– 514.
  27. Philo, C. (2020) Doing space and star power: Foucault, exclusion and the spatial history of social policy. In: Whitworth, A. (Ed.) Bridging the gap between geography and social policy: Towards a spatial social policy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, pp. 41– 68.
  28. Prison Reform Trust (PRT) (2021c) The pandemic: One year on. 24 March. Prison Reform Trust > Press & Policy > News > Coronavirus.
  29. Raghavan, V. (2020) Prisons and the pandemic: The panopticon plays out. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23, 388– 397. PMC7721407 34720475
  30. Schliehe, A. (2021) Young women's carceral geographies. Abandonment, trouble and mobility. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
  31. Schliehe, A.K. & Crewe, B. (2022) Top bunk, bottom bunk: Cellsharing in prisons. The British Journal of Criminology, 62, 484– 500.
  32. Scott, J.B. (2020) A pandemic in prisons. Social Anthropology, 28, 352– 353. 32836980 PMC7300685
  33. Sparke, M. (2014) Health. In: Lee, R. et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of human geography, Vol. 2. London, UK: Sage, pp. 680– 704.
  34. Sparke, M. (2017) Austerity and the embodiment of neoliberalism as ill‐health: Towards a theory of biological sub‐citizenship. Social Science & Medicine, 187, 287– 295. 28057384
  35. Sparke, M. & Anguelov, D. (2020) Contextualising coronavirus geographically. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45, 498– 508.
  36. Sykes, G.M. (1958) The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  37. Thomas, R. (2022) Virus governance in the United Kingdom. In: Kettemann, M.C. & Lachmeyer, K. (Eds.) Pandemocracy in Europe: Power, parliaments and people in times of COVID‐19. Oxford, UK: Bloomsbury, pp. 71– 90.
  38. Turner, J. (2016) The prison boundary: Between society and carceral space. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Tyner, J.A. (2009) War, violence and population: Making the body count. London, UK: Guilford Press.
  40. van den Berge, L. (2020) Biopolitics and the coronavirus: Foucault, Agamben, Zizek. Nederlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 49, 3– 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schliehe, A., Philo, C., Carlin, B., Fallon, C., & Penna, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Independent Scholar Glasgow UK
  • Independent Scholar Oxford UK
Corresponding author
Schliehe, Anna
Venue
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-15
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
880-897
ISSN
  • 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5661
OpenAlex
W4290145117
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, prisons, carceral state, Michel Foucault, disciplinary power, biopolitics, prison reform, prison abolition, British prisons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review