The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Anti‐dumping duty circumvention through trade rerouting: Evidence from Chinese exporters
Open accessAbstract
We study the evasion of US anti‐dumping duties by some Chinese exporters through trade rerouting via third countries or regions. Using detailed monthly trade data reported by China and the US Customs during the period of 2002–06, we find that US anti‐dumping actions against China lead to a stronger positive correlation between US imports from third countries and Chinese exports to the same third countries. Such a positive correlation is more pronounced for the products subject to anti‐dumping duties (treatment groups) than similar products not subject to these duties (control groups). The evidence is stronger for less‐differentiated products whose certificates of origins are easier to be modified and is stronger for third countries where the rerouting cost is low. These findings are consistent with a trade rerouting story, rather than a simple story of trade diversion (i.e., increase in some third countries' imports from China) and trade deflection (i.e., increase in some third‐country exports to the US). We also rule out other alternative stories, consider prior production in third countries and concurrent anti‐dumping actions against China or third countries, pay a particular attention to the many zero trade flows in the monthly level data and check the robustness to using an alternative control group and quarterly data, etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1093/epolic/eix001 · DOI
- 10.1111/ecin.12345 · DOI
- 10.1257/000282804322970742 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756461.ch9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01617.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1162/REST_a_00132 · DOI
- 10.1093/epolic/eix002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1015269804381 · DOI
- 10.1002/soej.12113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.08.005 · DOI
- Matsushita M., 2010, Some international and domestic anti‐dumping issues, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 5, 249
- 10.1111/twec.12113 · DOI
- 10.1111/0008-4085.00090 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00009-9 · DOI
- 10.1162/003465302317331955 · DOI
- 10.1162/rest.89.3.416 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01452.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01719.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003 · DOI
- Zanardi M., 2017, Anti‐dumping echoing, Economic Inquiry, 55, 655, 10.1111/ecin.12369 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., & Shi, H.
- Affiliations
- Kennesaw State University (US)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Shi, Huimin
- Venue
- The World Economy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-13
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1427-1466
- ISSN
- 0378-5920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9701
- OpenAlex
- W3124395853
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- World Economy (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Keywords
- antidumping duties, trade diversion, Chinese exporters, US-China trade, certificate of origin, trade deflection, product differentiation, customs data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐dumping duty circumvention through trade rerouting: Evidence from Chinese exporters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/twec.12747
- The paper
- Liu, X., & Shi, H. (2019). Anti‐dumping duty circumvention through trade rerouting: Evidence from Chinese exporters. The World Economy. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12747