The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The murine excisional wound model: Contraction revisited
Open accessAbstract
Rodent models of healing are considered limited because of the perception that rodent wounds heal by contraction while humans heal by reepithelialization The purpose of this report is to present evidence that simple murine excisional wounds provide a valid and reproducible wound model that heals by both contraction and reepithelialization. Previous studies have shown that, although rodent wounds contract by up to 80%, much of this contraction occurs only after epithelial closure. To confirm these previous findings, we measured re‐epithelialization and contraction in three separate mouse strains, (BALB/c, db/+, and db/db); reepithelialization and contraction each accounted for ∼40 to 60% of the initial closure of full thickness excisional wounds. After closure, the wound continues to contract and this provides the impression of dominant closure by contraction. In conclusion, the simple excisional rodent wound model produces a well defined and readily identifiable wound bed over which the process of reepithelialization is clearly measurable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential Roles of Macrophages in Diverse Phases of Skin Repair
Lucas, T., Waisman, A., Ranjan, R., Roes, J., Krieg, T., Müller, W., Roers, A., & Eming, S. A. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903356 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
Skin wound healing in humans and mice: Challenges in translational research
Zomer, H. D., & Trentin, A. G. (2018) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.12.009 · Cited by 534
Comparative regenerative mechanisms across different mammalian tissues
Iismaa, S. E., Kaidonis, X., Nicks, A. M., Bogush, N., Kikuchi, K., Naqvi, N., Harvey, R. P., Husain, A., & Graham, R. M. (2018) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41536-018-0044-5 · Cited by 253
Gugliandolo, E., Macrì, F., Fusco, R., Siracusa, R., D’Amico, R., Cordaro, M., Peritore, A. F., Impellizzeri, D., Genovese, T., Cuzzocrea, S., et al. (2021) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci8080167 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, L., Mirza, R., Kwon, Y., DiPietro, L. A., & Koh, T. J.
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 874-877
- ISSN
- 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-475X
- OpenAlex
- W2111587806
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The murine excisional wound model: Contraction revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/wrr.12338
- The paper
- Chen, L., Mirza, R., Kwon, Y., DiPietro, L. A., & Koh, T. J. (2015). The murine excisional wound model: Contraction revisited. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.