Cited by 119Wound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicinePlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Regeneration of injured skin and peripheral nerves requires control of wound contraction, not scar formation

Open access
Yannas, Ioannis V., Tzeranis, Dimitrios S., So, Peter T. C.·2017·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

We review the mounting evidence that regeneration is induced in wounds in skin and peripheral nerves by a simple modification of the wound healing process. Here, the process of induced regeneration is compared to the other two well‐known processes by which wounds close, i.e., contraction and scar formation. Direct evidence supports the hypothesis that the mechanical force of contraction (planar in skin wounds, circumferential in nerve wounds) is the driver guiding the orientation of assemblies of myofibroblasts (MFB) and collagen fibers during scar formation in untreated wounds. We conclude that scar formation depends critically on wound contraction and is, therefore, a healing process secondary to contraction. Wound contraction and regeneration did not coincide during healing in a number of experimental models of spontaneous (untreated) regeneration described in the literature. Furthermore, in other studies in which an efficient contraction‐blocker, a collagen scaffold named dermis regeneration template (DRT), and variants of it, were grafted on skin wounds or peripheral nerve wounds, regeneration was systematically observed in the absence of contraction. We conclude that contraction and regeneration are mutually antagonistic processes. A dramatic change in the phenotype of MFB was observed when the contraction‐blocking scaffold DRT was used to treat wounds in skin and peripheral nerves. The phenotype change was directly observed as drastic reduction in MFB density, dispersion of MFB assemblies and loss of alignment of the long MFB axes. These observations were explained by the evidence of a surface‐biological interaction of MFB with the scaffold, specifically involving binding of MFB integrins α 1 β 1 and α 2 β 1 to ligands GFOGER and GLOGER naturally present on the surface of the collagen scaffold. In summary, we show that regeneration of wounded skin and peripheral nerves in the adult mammal can be induced simply by appropriate control of wound contraction, rather than of scar formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wrr.12516

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myofibroblasts are responsible for contraction of the wound.

    “This remodeling phase is largely driven by myofibroblasts, which develop from fibroblasts in response to both mechanical tension and TGF-β signaling and are responsible for contraction of the wound [94].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

  • SMA is responsible for generating the contractile force attributed to myofibroblasts.

    “Myofibroblasts express smooth muscle actin (SMA), which is responsible for generating the contractile force attributed to this cell type [94, 95].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

  • The remodeling phase is largely driven by myofibroblasts.

    “This remodeling phase is largely driven by myofibroblasts, which develop from fibroblasts in response to both mechanical tension and TGF-β signaling and are responsible for contraction of the wound [94].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

  • Myofibroblasts develop from fibroblasts in response to mechanical tension and TGF-β signaling.

    “This remodeling phase is largely driven by myofibroblasts, which develop from fibroblasts in response to both mechanical tension and TGF-β signaling and are responsible for contraction of the wound [94].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

  • Myofibroblasts express smooth muscle actin (SMA).

    “Myofibroblasts express smooth muscle actin (SMA), which is responsible for generating the contractile force attributed to this cell type [94, 95].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]Rudolph R Van de Berg J Ehrlich P Wound contraction and scar contracture Wound Healing Cohen IK Diegelmann RF Lindblad WJ Philadelphia W.B. Saunders 1992
  2. [43]Goss RJ Regeneration versus repair Wound Healing Cohen IK Diegelmann RF Lindblad WJ Philadelphia W. B. Saunders 1992
  3. [73]Troxel K Delay of skin wound contraction by porous collagen-GAG matrices PhD thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 1994
  4. [74]Tzeranis DS Imaging studies of peripheral nerve regeneration induced by porous collagen biomaterials PhD thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yannas, I. V., Tzeranis, D. S., & So, P. T. C.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Yannas, Ioannis V.
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
177-191
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2605241618
Cited by
119
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1 NS051320, 5‐P41‐EB015871‐28)
  • Horizon 2020 (DLV‐658850)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
wound contraction, scar formation, peripheral nerve regeneration, skin wound healing, myofibroblasts, collagen scaffolds, integrin binding, collagen fiber alignment, natural regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cicatrix, Collagen, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Skin, Surface Properties, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review