A porcine xenograft‐derived bone scaffold is a biocompatible bone graft substitute: An assessment of cytocompatibility and the alpha‐Gal epitope
Abstract
Background: Xenografts are an attractive alternative to traditional bone grafts because of the large supply from donors with predictable morphology and biology as well as minimal risk of human disease transmission. Clinical series involving xenograft bone transplantation, most commonly from bovine sources, have reported poor results with frequent graft rejection and failure to integrate with host tissue. Failures have been attributed to residual alpha‐Gal epitope in the xenograft which humans produce natural antibody against. To the authors' knowledge, there is currently no xenograft‐derived bone graft substitute that has been adopted by orthopedic surgeons for routine clinical use. Methods: In the current study, a bone scaffold intended to serve as a bone graft substitute was derived from porcine cancellous bone using a tissue decellularization and chemical oxidation protocol. In vitro cytocompatibility, pathogen clearance, and alpha‐Gal quantification tests were used to assess the safety of the bone scaffold intended for human use. Results: In vitro studies showed the scaffold was free of processing chemicals and biocompatible with mouse and human cell lines. When bacterial and viral pathogens were purposefully added to porcine donor tissue, processing successfully removed these pathogens to comply with sterility assurance levels established by allograft tissue providers. Critically, 98.5% of the alpha‐Gal epitope was removed from donor tissue after decellularization as shown by ELISA inhibition assay and immunohistochemical staining. Conclusions: The current investigation supports the biologic safety of bone scaffolds derived from porcine donors using a decellularization protocol that meets current sterility assurance standards. The majority of the highly immunogenic xenograft carbohydrate was removed from donor tissue, and these findings support further in vivo investigation of xenograft‐derived bone tissue for orthopedic clinical application.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
α-gal epitopes are identified as one of the main barriers to the clinical application of processed animal bone grafts and tendons.
“Nonetheless, α-gal epitopes are identified as one of the main barriers to the clinical application of processed animal bone grafts [124] and tendons [116].”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [124]
Cites
The α-gal epitope (Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R) in xenotransplantation
Galili, U. (2001) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/s0300-9084(01)01294-9 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kasravi, M., Ahmadi, A., Babajani, A., Mazloomnejad, R., Hatamnejad, M. R., Shariatzadeh, S., Bahrami, S., & Niknejad, H. (2023) · Biomaterials Research · doi:10.1186/s40824-023-00348-z · Cited by 316 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bracey, D. N., Seyler, T. M., Jinnah, A. H., Smith, T. L., Ornelles, D. A., Deora, R., Parks, G. D., Van Dyke, M. E., & Whitlock, P. W.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Duke University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg Virginia
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bracey, Daniel N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Xenotransplantation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-25
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e12534-e12534
- ISSN
- 0908-665X (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3089
- OpenAlex
- W2963797137
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Xenotransplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
- Keywords
- porcine xenograft, bone graft substitutes, bone scaffolds, decellularization, alpha-gal epitope, cytocompatibility, chemical oxidation, pathogen clearance, sterility assurance
- MeSH terms
- alpha-Galactosidase, Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Swine, Transplantation, Heterologous, Biomarkers, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Scaffolds, Heterografts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review