Cited by 3Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Exercise‐induced dynamic hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Open access
D'Cruz, Rebecca F., Wilkins, Dominic, Jolley, Caroline J.·2026·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory lung disease caused by inhalation of noxious particles, most commonly cigarette smoking. The consequent changes in airways, lung parenchyma and pulmonary vasculature lead to increased resistive, elastic and threshold loads and impaired capacity of the respiratory muscle pump. COPD is characterized by progressive expiratory flow limitation. During exercise, increases in respiratory rate lead to shortening of expiratory time with consequent gas trapping. The resultant increase in end‐expiratory lung volume is referred to as dynamic hyperinflation. Dynamic hyperinflation leads to further load–capacity imbalance with consequent increased neural respiratory drive to maintain ventilatory homeostasis, which is closely related to exertional breathlessness intensity. Neuromechanical dissociation, resulting in uncoupling of increased neural respiratory drive from ventilatory output, develops due to mechanical limitations on tidal volume expansion and reduced force‐generating capacity of the diaphragm as dynamic hyperinflation progresses during exercise. This review provides an overview of methods of measuring dynamic hyperinflation in COPD and clinical interventions that aim to alleviate lung hyperinflation and improve exercise tolerance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/ep091459

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
D'Cruz, R. F., Wilkins, D., & Jolley, C. J.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jolley, Caroline J.
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-02-05
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
2476-2484
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W7128020310
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dynamic hyperinflation, physical activity, expiratory flow limitation, air trapping, end-expiratory lung volume, neural respiratory drive, exertional dyspnea, exercise tolerance
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Lung, Tidal Volume, Exercise, Respiratory Mechanics, Exercise Tolerance, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review