Cited by 5Muscle activation and electromyography studiesLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

A comparison of the mechanogram of the ankle jerk in men and women: observations using an adjustable dorsiflexing torque, high inertia mechanical filter and automatic readout system

Walsh, EG, Wright, GW, Davies, A, Lin, JP, Thompson, J·1993·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

An instrument of new design has been constructed to measure the contractions of the calf musculature resulting from a tap on the Achilles tendon. The instrument provides a predetermined and adjustable dorsiflexing torque from a printed motor, but the contractions are virtually isometric as the system is one of high inertia. Peak force, half‐contraction time and half‐relaxation time are monitored by electronic circuits equipped with digital output meters. Observations have been made on fifty‐two male and forty‐five female medical students. There were no significant differences in the peak torques generated by the contractions between the men and women students and no difference in the half‐contraction times. The half‐relaxation times of the women were, however, significantly longer than those of the men (P = 0.0001). In another group of students the EMG discharges following a tendon tap were recorded, there was no significant difference in the duration of the activity in men and women. Observations have also been made on twenty‐three male and seventy female subjects whose mean ages were in the mid‐sixties. The peak torques generated by the contractions were significantly higher in the women (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the half‐contraction times, but the half‐relaxation times of the women were significantly longer (P = 0.001). Possible reasons for the differences are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/expphysiol.1993.sp003704

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, E., Wright, G., Davies, A., Lin, J., & Thompson, J.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-07
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
531-540
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W2120259180
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
ankle jerk, Achilles tendon reflex, mechanogram, sex differences, half-relaxation time, peak torque, electromyography, aging, isometric contraction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Ankle, Anthropometry, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Equipment and Supplies, Female, Humans, Male, Methods, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Relaxation, Reflex, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review