Cited by 34Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsRetinal Development and Disorders

Recovery of visual functions in amblyopic animals following brief exposure to total darkness

Open access
Mitchell, Donald E., MacNeill, Katelyn, Crowder, Nathan A., Holman, Kaitlyn, Duffy, Kevin R.·2016·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: Occlusion of one eye of kittens (monocular deprivation) results in a severe and permanent loss of visual acuity in that eye, which parallels closely the vision loss characteristic of human amblyopia. We extended earlier work to demonstrate that amblyopic vision loss can be either blocked or erased very fast by a 10 day period of total darkness following a period of monocular deprivation that begins near birth and extends to at least 8 weeks of age. The parameters of darkness were strict because no visual recovery was observed after 5 days of darkness. In addition, short periods of light introduced each day during an otherwise 10 day period of darkness obliterated the benefits. Despite recovery of normal visual acuity, only one‐quarter of the animals showed evidence of having attained normal stereoscopic vision. A period of total darkness may catalyse and improve treatment outcomes in amblyopic children. A 10 day period of total darkness has been shown to either block or erase the severe effects on vision of a prior short period of monocular deprivation (MD) in kittens depending on whether darkness is contiguous or is delayed with respect to the period of MD. We have extended these earlier findings from kittens for which the period of MD began at 1 month and lasted for 1 week to more clinically relevant situations where MD began near birth and lasted for ≥6 weeks. Despite the far longer MD and the absence of prior binocular vision, all animals recovered normal visual acuity in the previously deprived eye. As before, when the period of darkness followed immediately after MD, the vision of both eyes was initially very poor but, subsequently, the acuity of each eye increased gradually and equally to attain normal levels in ∼7 weeks. By contrast, when darkness was introduced 8 weeks after MD, the visual acuity of the deprived eye recovered quickly to normal levels in just 1 week without any change in the vision of the fellow (non‐deprived) eye. Short (15 or 30 min) periods of illumination each day during an otherwise 10 day period of darkness obliterated all the benefits for vision, and a 5 day period of darkness was also completely ineffective. Measurements of depth perception indicated that, despite possessing normal visual acuity in both eyes, only about one‐quarter of the animals showed evidence of having attained normal stereoscopic vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp270981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reactivation of plasticity through dark exposure has been demonstrated in several species, including kittens, and is effective in mice up to P535 days old.

    “The reactivation of plasticity through dark exposure has now been demonstrated in several species, including kittens (Duffy and Mitchell, 2013; Mitchell et al., 2016) and is effective in mice up to P535 days old (Stodieck et al., 2014).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 34

Authors
Mitchell, D. E., MacNeill, K., Crowder, N. A., Holman, K., & Duffy, K. R.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Donald E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-15
Volume
594
Issue
1
Pages
149-167
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1943051336
Cited by
34
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP102653)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
amblyopia, monocular deprivation, visual acuity recovery, total darkness, visual rehabilitation, depth perception, stereo vision, kittens, binocular vision, amblyopia treatment
MeSH terms
Amblyopia, Animals, Cats, Darkness, Depth Perception, Female, Male, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review