Cited by 101Thermoregulation and physiological responsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

Influence of menstrual phase and arid vs. humid heat stress on autonomic and behavioural thermoregulation during exercise in trained but unacclimated women

Open access
Lei, Tze‐Huan, Stannard, Stephen R., Perry, Blake G., Schlader, Zachary J., Cotter, James D., Mündel, Toby·2017·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: Despite an attenuated fluctuation in ovarian hormone concentrations in well‐trained women, one in two of such women believe their menstrual cycle negatively impacts training and performance. Forthcoming large international events will expose female athletes to hot environments, and studies evaluating aerobic exercise performance in such environments across the menstrual cycle are sparse, with mixed findings. We have identified that autonomic heat loss responses at rest and during fixed‐intensity exercise in well‐trained women are not affected by menstrual cycle phase, but differ between dry and humid heat. Furthermore, exercise performance is not different across the menstrual cycle, yet is lower in humid heat, in conjunction with reduced evaporative cooling. Menstrual cycle phase does not appear to affect exercise performance in the heat in well‐trained women, but humidity impairs performance, probably due to reduced evaporative power. We studied thermoregulatory responses of ten well‐trained [, 57 (7) ml min−1 kg−1] eumenorrheic women exercising in dry and humid heat, across their menstrual cycle. They completed four trials, each of resting and cycling at fixed intensities (125 and 150 W), to assess autonomic regulation, then self‐paced intensity (30 min work trial), to assess behavioural regulation. Trials were in early‐follicular (EF) and mid‐luteal (ML) phases in dry (DRY) and humid (HUM) heat matched for wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT, 27°C). During rest and fixed‐intensity exercise, rectal temperature was ∼0.2°C higher in ML than EF (P < 0.01) independent of environment (P = 0.66). Mean skin temperature did not differ between menstrual phases (P ≥ 0.13) but was higher in DRY than HUM (P < 0.01). Local sweat rate and/or forearm blood flow differed as a function of menstrual phase and environment (interaction: P ≤ 0.01). Exercise performance did not differ between phases [EF: 257 (37), ML: 255 (43) kJ, P = 0.62], but was 7 (9)% higher in DRY than HUM [263 (39), 248 (40) kJ; P < 0.01] in conjunction with equivalent autonomic regulation and thermal strain but higher evaporative cooling [16 (6) W m 2; P < 0.01]. In well‐trained women exercising in the heat: (1) menstrual phase did not affect performance, (2) humidity impaired performance due to reduced evaporative cooling despite matched WBGT and (3) behavioural responses nullified thermodynamic and autonomic differences associated with menstrual phase and dry vs. humid heat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp273176

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kerslake DM (1972). The Stress of Hot Environments. Cambridge University Press, London.
  2. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, G ómez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchior JC & Pirlich M (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 23, 1226-1243.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, T., Stannard, S. R., Perry, B. G., Schlader, Z. J., Cotter, J. D., & Mündel, T.
Affiliations
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Mündel, Toby
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
595
Issue
9
Pages
2823-2837
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2558964168
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
menstrual cycle phases, heat stress, humid heat, dry heat, thermoregulation, autonomic thermoregulation, behavioral thermoregulation, exercise performance, female athletes, ovarian hormones, evaporative cooling, sweat rate, rectal temperature, skin temperature, forearm blood flow, thermal strain, eumenorrhea, self-paced exercise
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Body Temperature Regulation, Female, Humans, Humidity, Menstrual Cycle, Regional Blood Flow, Exercise, Heat-Shock Response, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review