The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading
Abstract
Key points: The female diaphragm fatigues at a slower rate compared to that of males, with blunted cardiovascular consequences (i.e. inspiratory muscle metaboreflex). It is unclear if these findings are a function of relative or absolute diaphragmatic work. We asked if sex differences in diaphragm fatigue and the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex persisted during inspiratory loading performed at equal absolute intensities. We found that matching men and women for absolute diaphragmatic work resulted in an equal degree of diaphragm fatigue, despite women performing significantly greater work relative to body mass. Metabolite‐induced reflex influences in sympathetic outflow originating from the diaphragm are attenuated in women, with potential implications for blood flow distribution during exercise. In response to inspiratory pressure‐threshold loading (PTL), women have greater inspiratory muscle endurance time, slower rate of diaphragm fatigue development, and a blunted pressor response compared to men. It is unclear if these differences are due to discrepancies in absolute diaphragm force output. We tested the hypothesis that following inspirations performed at equal absolute intensities, females would develop a similar level of diaphragm fatigue and an attenuated cardiovascular response relative to men. Healthy young men (n = 8, age = 24 ± 3 years) and women (n = 8, age = 23 ± 3 years) performed PTL whilst targeting a transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) of 92 cmH 2 O for 5 min. Diaphragm fatigue was assessed via twitch Pdi (Pdi,tw) using cervical magnetic stimulation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored continuously. During PTL, the absolute amount of diaphragm work was not different between men (13,399 ± 2019 cmH 2 O s) and women (12,986 ± 1846 cmH 2 O s; P > 0.05); however, women performed the PTL task at a higher relative di/Pdi,max. Following inspiratory PTL, the magnitude of reduction in Pdi,tw was similar between men (−27.1 ± 7.2%) and women (−23.8 ± 13.8%; P > 0.05). There were significant increases in HR over time (P < 0.05), but this did not differ on the basis of sex (P > 0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly over time in both men and women (P < 0.05); however, the rate of change was higher in men (6.24 ± 2.54 mmHg min−1) than in women (4.15 ± 2.52 mmHg min−1) (P < 0.05). We conclude that the female diaphragm is protected against severe fatigue when inspiratory work is excessive and as a result does not evoke overt sympathoexcitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In normoxia, it was reported that the metaboreflex solicited for a given level of diaphragm fatigue may be less pronounced in women compared with men (Geary et al., 2019).”
From Sex-Specific Effects of Respiratory Muscle Endurance Training on Cycling Time Trial Performance in Normoxia and Hypoxia (2021) · cites this paper as Geary et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Geary et al. (2019) found that, in normoxia, matching men and women for absolute diaphragmatic work resulted in an equal degree of diaphragm fatigue, despite women performing significantly greater work relative to body mass.”
From Sex-Specific Effects of Respiratory Muscle Endurance Training on Cycling Time Trial Performance in Normoxia and Hypoxia (2021) · cites this paper as Geary et al. (2019)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses
Hunter, S. K. (2014) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12234 · Cited by 595
Respiratory influences on sympathetic vasomotor outflow in humans
Dempsey, J. A., Sheel, A. W., St. Croix, C. M., & Morgan, B. J. (2002) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0034-5687(01)00327-9 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01152.2001 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00032.2002 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01596.2005 · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.5.1190 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.5.1196 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.6.1597 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.3.691 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphys.2018.01133 · DOI
- 10.1139/y01-008 · DOI
- 10.1113/EP086566 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139477 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.1.245 · DOI
- 10.1111/sms.12600 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00452.2007 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009 · DOI
- 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181aa63e2 · DOI
- 10.1113/EP085370 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01342.2003 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00562.2010 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019477 · DOI · Paper page
- Joyner MJ, 2015, Neural control of the circulation: how sex and age differences interact in humans, Compr Physiol, 5, 193
- Kleinbaum DG, 2008, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods
- Lublin A, 1995, Sex differences in blood flow distribution of normothermic and heat‐stressed rabbits, Am J Physiol, 268, R66
- 10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.474 · DOI
- 10.1136/thx.2003.009894 · DOI
- 10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · DOI
- 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000881 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01145.2002 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.2.434 · DOI
- 10.1002/mus.23836 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2018 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277k.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpheart.00798.2001 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1311 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00187.2016 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.604 · DOI
- 10.1113/JP275794 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resp.2017.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exger.2015.07.001 · DOI
Cited by
Chambault, J., Grand, G., & Kayser, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.700620 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Geary, C. M., Welch, J. F., McDonald, M. R., Peters, C. M., Leahy, M. G., Reinhard, P. A., & Sheel, A. W.
- Affiliations
- School of Kinesiology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-18
- Volume
- 597
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4797-4808
- ISSN
- 0022-3751
- 1469-7793
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Government of Canada (RGPIN‐2017‐03749)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jp278380
- The paper
- Geary, C. M., Welch, J. F., McDonald, M. R., Peters, C. M., Leahy, M. G., Reinhard, P. A., & Sheel, A. W. (2019). Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jp278380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.