Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading

Geary, Caitlin M., Welch, Joseph F., McDonald, Malcolm R., Peters, Carli M., Leahy, Michael G., Reinhard, Paige A., Sheel, A. William·2019·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: The female diaphragm fatigues at a slower rate compared to that of males, with blunted cardiovascular consequences (i.e. inspiratory muscle metaboreflex). It is unclear if these findings are a function of relative or absolute diaphragmatic work. We asked if sex differences in diaphragm fatigue and the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex persisted during inspiratory loading performed at equal absolute intensities. We found that matching men and women for absolute diaphragmatic work resulted in an equal degree of diaphragm fatigue, despite women performing significantly greater work relative to body mass. Metabolite‐induced reflex influences in sympathetic outflow originating from the diaphragm are attenuated in women, with potential implications for blood flow distribution during exercise. In response to inspiratory pressure‐threshold loading (PTL), women have greater inspiratory muscle endurance time, slower rate of diaphragm fatigue development, and a blunted pressor response compared to men. It is unclear if these differences are due to discrepancies in absolute diaphragm force output. We tested the hypothesis that following inspirations performed at equal absolute intensities, females would develop a similar level of diaphragm fatigue and an attenuated cardiovascular response relative to men. Healthy young men (n = 8, age = 24 ± 3 years) and women (n = 8, age = 23 ± 3 years) performed PTL whilst targeting a transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) of 92 cmH 2 O for 5 min. Diaphragm fatigue was assessed via twitch Pdi (Pdi,tw) using cervical magnetic stimulation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored continuously. During PTL, the absolute amount of diaphragm work was not different between men (13,399 ± 2019 cmH 2 O s) and women (12,986 ± 1846 cmH 2 O s; P > 0.05); however, women performed the PTL task at a higher relative di/Pdi,max. Following inspiratory PTL, the magnitude of reduction in Pdi,tw was similar between men (−27.1 ± 7.2%) and women (−23.8 ± 13.8%; P > 0.05). There were significant increases in HR over time (P < 0.05), but this did not differ on the basis of sex (P > 0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly over time in both men and women (P < 0.05); however, the rate of change was higher in men (6.24 ± 2.54 mmHg min−1) than in women (4.15 ± 2.52 mmHg min−1) (P < 0.05). We conclude that the female diaphragm is protected against severe fatigue when inspiratory work is excessive and as a result does not evoke overt sympathoexcitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp278380

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01152.2001 · DOI
  2. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00032.2002 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01596.2005 · DOI
  4. 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.5.1190 · DOI
  6. 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.5.1196 · DOI
  7. 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.6.1597 · DOI
  8. 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.3.691 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fphys.2018.01133 · DOI
  10. 10.1139/y01-008 · DOI
  11. 10.1113/EP086566 · DOI
  12. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139477 · DOI
  13. 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.1.245 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/sms.12600 · DOI
  15. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00452.2007 · DOI
  16. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181aa63e2 · DOI
  18. 10.1113/EP085370 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01342.2003 · DOI
  20. 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/ajpregu.00562.2010 · DOI
  22. 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019477 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Joyner MJ, 2015, Neural control of the circulation: how sex and age differences interact in humans, Compr Physiol, 5, 193
  24. Kleinbaum DG, 2008, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods
  25. Lublin A, 1995, Sex differences in blood flow distribution of normothermic and heat‐stressed rabbits, Am J Physiol, 268, R66
  26. 10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.474 · DOI
  27. 10.1136/thx.2003.009894 · DOI
  28. 10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · DOI
  29. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000881 · DOI
  30. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01145.2002 · DOI
  31. 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.2.434 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/mus.23836 · DOI
  33. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2018 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277k.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1152/ajpheart.00798.2001 · DOI
  36. 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1311 · DOI
  37. 10.1152/ajpregu.00187.2016 · DOI
  38. 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.604 · DOI
  39. 10.1113/JP275794 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.resp.2017.05.011 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.exger.2015.07.001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Geary, C. M., Welch, J. F., McDonald, M. R., Peters, C. M., Leahy, M. G., Reinhard, P. A., & Sheel, A. W.
Affiliations
School of Kinesiology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-18
Volume
597
Issue
18
Pages
4797-4808
ISSN
  • 0022-3751
  • 1469-7793
Cited by
43
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Government of Canada (RGPIN‐2017‐03749)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jp278380
The paper
Geary, C. M., Welch, J. F., McDonald, M. R., Peters, C. M., Leahy, M. G., Reinhard, P. A., & Sheel, A. W. (2019). Diaphragm fatigue and inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in men and women matched for absolute diaphragmatic work during pressure-threshold loading. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jp278380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.