The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Visual Perception and the Statistical Properties of Natural Scenes
Geisler, W. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085632 · Cited by 677
Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina
Barlow, H. B., & Levick, W. R. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008836 · Cited by 296
Self-citation(1987) · PubMed · Cited by 290
Responses to single quanta of light in retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Barlow, H. B., Levick, W. R., & Yoon, M. (1971) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(71)90033-2 · Cited by 277
Self-citationEckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2000) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212096 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Barlow, H. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1957-05-23
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-488
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2044098209
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005774
- The paper
- Barlow, H. B. (1957). Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
