Cited by 33Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermoregulation and physiological responsesThermal Regulation in Medicine

Radiant and convective heat loss from the new-born pig

Open access
Mount, L. E.·1964·The Journal of Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007445

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mount, L. E.
Corresponding author
Mount, L. E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1964-08
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
96-113
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2054243451
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
Keywords
radiative heat loss, convective heat loss, newborn pigs, neonatal thermoregulation, heat exchange, body temperature
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Body Temperature Regulation, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Physiology, Comparative, Research, Skin, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review