S‐potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae)
Open accessAbstract
1. S-potentials were recorded in fish from units which never responded by depolarization. These hyperpolarizing units are the L-units of Svaetichin & MacNichol (1958).2. Figure 5 shows some sets of action spectra from a single unit. For each curve the criterion of action was hyperpolarization to a fixed level, by lights of various wave-lengths. When these lights fell upon zero background (circles) the curves show that two kinds of cone contribute to the action spectrum, one with the 620 nm pigment of Marks and one with the 680 nm pigment of Naka & Rushton (1966a).3. When the lights fell upon (i) a fixed green background (triangles, Fig. 5), or (ii) a fixed red one (squares), the action spectra changed in a way that indicated greater prominence of (i) the 680 nm system (ii) the 540 nm green system that was not conspicuous without adaptation to red.4. These observations (on the tench Tinca) are contrary to the conclusions of Svaetichin & McNichol (on Gerridae) that the action spectrum is unaltered in shape by adaptation to coloured lights. The contribution of the green cones, for example, was actually absolutely greater under deep red adaptation.5. It is concluded that L-units receive signals from 680, 620, 540 nm and possibly also the blue cones, that the quantum catch in all these contribute to the hyperpolarization produced, but their interaction is more complicated than the simple addition of independent cone effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The power law relationship is consistent with a form of the Naka-Rushton function commonly used to describe the mapping from reliability to neural gain.
“The relationship is also consistent with a form of the Naka-Rushton function [84, 85] commonly used to describe the mapping from reliability to neural gain g:”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [84]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
Divisive Normalization in Olfactory Population Codes
Olsen, S. R., Bhandawat, V., & Wilson, R. I. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.009 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports
Adler, W. T., & Ma, W. J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006572 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Cholinergic suppression of visual responses in primate V1 is mediated by GABAergic inhibition
Disney, A. A., Aoki, C., & Hawken, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00188.2012 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Bio-Inspired Video Enhancement for Small Moving Target Detection
Uzair, M., Brinkworth, R. S., & Finn, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.3043113 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Duncan, W. C., Johnson, K. A., & Wehr, T. A. (1998) · Journal of Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1177/074873098129000165 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sakamoto, K., Katori, Y., Saito, N., Yoshida, S., Aihara, K., & Mushiake, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080906 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Naka, K. I., & Rushton, W. A. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-08
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-599
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC1395832
- OpenAlex
- W2043052802
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Keywords
- S-potentials, retinal photoreceptors, action spectrum, color vision, cone pigments, blue cones, light adaptation, hyperpolarization, fish retina, tench, Cyprinidae
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electrophysiology, Light, Retina, Retinal Pigments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review