The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings
Open accessAbstract
1. Visual resolving power is known to be poorer for objects oriented obliquely as compared with horizontal and vertical orientations. Experiments were designed to evaluate the optical and neurophysiological factors involved. 2. Gratings with a sinusoidal light distribution were generated on the face of an oscilloscope. Spatial frequency and contrast could be varied while keeping the mean luminance of the grating constant. 3. Using a homatropinized eye with an artificial pupil and carefully corrected refraction, high resolution in the vertical and horizontal meridians as compared with the oblique meridians was found for gratings ranging in spatial frequency from 1 to 35 c/deg. 4. It is concluded from the similar behaviour of low and high frequency gratings that neither focus errors nor optical aniseikonia can account for these findings. 5. Additional proof that optical factors cannot significantly account for these preferred directions of resolution was obtained by forming interference fringes directly on the retina using a neon—helium laser as a coherent light source. 6. Similar orientational changes in resolution were found by by‐passing the dioptrics with interference fringes. It is concluded that the effect is due to some orientational inequality in the visual nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229 · Cited by 2,603
Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.
Campbell, F. W., & Green, D. G. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784 · Cited by 1,595
Self-citationOptical and Photoelectric Analog of the Eye
Schade, O. H. (1956) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.46.000721 · Cited by 510
Visual Discrimination and Orientation*
Taylor, M. M. (1963) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.53.000763 · Cited by 113
Meridional Variations in Visual Acuity and Eye Movements during Fixation*
Nachmias, J. (1960) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.50.000569 · Cited by 28
Cited by
The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex
De Valois, R. L., William Yund, E., & Hepler, N. (1982) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90112-2 · Cited by 772
Orientational selectivity of the human visual system
Campbell, F. W., & Kulikowski, J. J. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008101 · Cited by 688
Self-citationThe eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches
Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., & Katz, S. M. (1995) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03208380 · Cited by 340
A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.9.6 · Cited by 329
The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90020-w · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., & Levinson, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-11
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 427-436
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1998896459
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100
- The paper
- Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., & Levinson, J. (1966). The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.