Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The margin of safety of neuromuscular transmission

Open access
Paton, W. D. M., Waud, D. R.·1967·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The margin of safety for neuromuscular transmission in the tibialis and sartorius muscles of the cat has been determined by measuring the ratio by which end‐plate depolarization produced by succinylcholine, decamethonium, octamethonium or iodocholine is antagonized, in the presence of neuromuscular block produced by tubocurarine, gallamine or DF‐596. The estimate of the margin of safety was independent of the particular drugs chosen for the measurement. 2. To produce threshold block to indirect stimulation once every 10 sec, a fractional occupancy by the antagonist of 0·76 ± 0·05 ( S.D.) was required; for nearly complete block, an occupancy of 0·917 ± 0·16 ( S.D.) was required. These figures correspond to factors of safety of 4·1 and 12 for the most sensitive and the most resistant groups of fibres respectively. 3. The interaction between the agonists and the antagonists, when tested over a wide range of dosage, did not conform with the conditions of full competitive equilibrium. It was concluded that this arose, not because of some interfering non‐competitive process, but because, during the relatively brief exposure to agonist, the equilibrium between the antagonist and the receptors is not significantly disturbed. An analysis of this condition of quasi‐equilibrium is given. A correction downwards of the direct estimates of the margin of safety is required, but this proves to be small, about 8%, and may not be significant. 4. The safety factor diminished when the motor nerve had been cut more than 5 hr; it is suggested that this represents an early sign of nerve degeneration. 5. With dog sartorius muscle, results similar to those in the cat were obtained. But for deep block in the rabbit, the safety factor was only about 4. 6. The existence of a substantial margin of safety influences considerably the interpretation of the time course of action of blocking drugs, and of comparisons between responses to nervous excitation and drug injection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008237

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Paton, W. D. M., & Waud, D. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1967-07
Volume
191
Issue
1
Pages
59-90
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2050795206
Cited by
405
References
10
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The margin of safety of neuromuscular transmission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008237
The paper
Paton, W. D. M., & Waud, D. R. (1967). The margin of safety of neuromuscular transmission. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.