The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat
Open accessAbstract
1. Micro‐electrode recordings have been made from single units in the visual cortex of the cat, during stimulation by moving grating patterns generated on a cathode ray tube. 2. The responses of the units have been measured in terms of either the frequency of impulses, or the contrast sensitivity, and expressed as a function of the spatial frequency of the grating pattern. 3. The amplitude of the responses recorded from cortical cell bodies was dependent upon the orientation of the moving grating, and for these units the stimulus was always presented at the preferred orientation. The response amplitude of other units did not depend upon the orientation of the grating stimulus, and these are believed to be the terminations of geniculate fibres. 4. The high spatial frequency end of the response function measured in terms of the contrast sensitivity could be well fitted by an exponential function. Subtraction of the blank count from the impulse frequency data gave a curve fitted by the same exponential function. The low frequency end was less consistent. 5. The spatial frequency at which this exponential function had fallen by one log. unit was taken to specify the position of the unit's response in the spatial frequency spectrum. For all units these values cover a range of four octaves of spatial frequency (from 0·18 to 3·8 cycles per degree). 6. It is suggested that these neurophysiological results support psychophysical evidence for the existence in the visual system of channels, each selectively sensitive to a narrow band of spatial frequencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Self-citationDISCHARGE PATTERNS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MAMMALIAN RETINA
Kuffler, S. W. (1953) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37 · Cited by 2,609
Cited by
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835
Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.58.6.1233 · Cited by 1,658
Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex
De Valois, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., & Thorell, L. G. (1982) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4 · Cited by 1,489
Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells*
Marĉelja, S. (1980) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.70.001297 · Cited by 1,252
A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT
Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00183-1 · Cited by 941
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F., & Enroth-Cugell, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-07
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-235
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1984667240
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008861
- The paper
- Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F., & Enroth-Cugell, C. (1969). The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.