The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancement of synaptic transmission by dendritic potentials in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat
Open accessAbstract
1. Monosynaptic transmission in cat lumbosacral motoneurones undergoing chromatolysis was studied by intracellular recording from 7 to 20 days after section of the appropriate ventral roots. 2. The average input resistance measured by passing polarizing currents across the cell membrane showed no significant difference between normal and chromatolysed motoneurones. Average rheobasic current for chromatolysed motoneurones was significantly lower (by about 30%) than that for normal motoneurones. 3. Spike‐like partial responses were commonly superimposed on monosynaptic EPSPs in chromatolysed motoneurones. These responses could be eliminated by stimulation of the bulbar inhibitory reticular formation, but could not be blocked by hyperpolarization applied to the motoneurone soma. 4. The spike‐like partial response in chromatolysed motoneurones showed a refractory period following (i) the antidromic invasion of the neurone generated by ventral root stimulation, and (ii) in response to two successive afferent stimuli. The refractory period ranged from 5 to 13 msec. 5. Initiation of the partial response had no direct relation with the amplitude of the underlying EPSP. The partial response could be evoked by small EPSPs of about 0·5 mV. 6. The action potential of a chromatolysed motoneurone arose from the partial response at different levels of depolarization, showing multiple trigger zones for spike initiation. Occasionally, chromatolysed motoneurones discharged in response to stimulation of a single afferent fibre. 7. In neurones where more than one spike‐like response was obtained, interaction between dendritic responses showed no refractoriness. 8. It is concluded that the partial response is an all‐or‐none event originating at some discrete site on dendrites, and that its presence increases the efficacy of synaptic excitation in chromatolysed motoneurones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The thalamus as a neuronal oscillator
STERIADE, M., & DESCHENES, M. (1984) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(84)90017-1 · Cited by 653
Dib-Hajj, S. D., Tyrrell, L., Black, J. A., & Waxman, S. G. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.15.8963 · Cited by 503
Purves, D. (1975) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011151 · Cited by 345
The nerve cell body response to axotomy
Grafstein, B. (1975) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(75)90170-3 · Cited by 313
The facial nerve axotomy model
Moran, L. B., & Graeber, M. B. (2004) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.11.004 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuno, M., & Llinás, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-11
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 807-821
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2092989748
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of synaptic transmission by dendritic potentials in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009243
- The paper
- Kuno, M., & Llinás, R. (1970). Enhancement of synaptic transmission by dendritic potentials in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.