The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in the statistics of transmitter release during facilitation
Open accessAbstract
1. The statistical nature of transmitter release during facilitation was studied at single synaptic sites by recording extracellular excitatory junctional potentials from the claw opener muscle in crayfish. 2. At low temperatures, single quanta could be counted in the responses to nerve impulses. The distribution of the number of quanta observed (x) was most accurately described by assuming that x is a binomial random variable. 3. A quantitative estimate was made of the effects of errors in counting quanta due to the simultaneous release of quanta and the release of quanta which were not individually detectable above the noise of the recording system. Such errors of observation cannot account for the deviation of quantal release from a Poisson distribution. 4. Facilitated release occurred in the responses to the second of two closely following nerve impulses and in the responses to successive impulses in a tetanus. In both cases, the increase in the average number of quanta released (m) could be attributed entirely to an increase in the probability (p) that available quanta were released. 5. The results can be interpreted most easily in terms of a model in which the maximum number of releasable quanta is limited by a finite number of discrete release sites within recording distance of the microelectrode. In this model, the binomial parameter n is an estimate of the number of these sites, and the statistical parameter p is a compound probability depending on the rate of re‐occupying sites after a nerve discharge and the probability that an impulse activates an occupied site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity
Zucker, R. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547 · Cited by 5,068
Self-citationHow brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world
Skarda, C. A., & Freeman, W. J. (1987) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00047336 · Cited by 2,097
Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal excitatory synapses
Schikorski, T., & Stevens, C. F. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05858.1997 · Cited by 997
Munc13-1 is essential for fusion competence of glutamatergic synaptic vesicles
Augustin, I., Rosenmund, C., Südhof, T. C., & Brose, N. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22768 · Cited by 787
Comparison of Two Forms of Long-Term Potentiation in Single Hippocampal Neurons
Zalutsky, R. A., & Nicoll, R. A. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2114039 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Zucker, R. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-03
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-810
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2108157067
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in the statistics of transmitter release during facilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010167
- The paper
- Zucker, R. S. (1973). Changes in the statistics of transmitter release during facilitation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.