The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area
Open accessAbstract
1. Single unit impulses were recorded from the ulnar and median nerves of awake human subjects with tungsten electrodes inserted percutaneously in the upper arm. 2. Forty‐nine rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors with receptive fields in the glabrous skin area were studied. Thirty‐nine units had small receptive fields with distinct borders (RA‐receptors) while ten units had large fields with indistinct borders (PC‐receptors). 3. The afferent response to stimuli of varying indentation amplitude and velocity of indentation, was analysed. 4. Amplitude thresholds varied from 0·05 to 1·65 mm for the RA‐receptors. For the PC‐receptors amplitude thresholds ranged from less than 0·05 to 1·95 mm. 5. Velocity thresholds varied for the RA‐receptors from 0·4 to 39·3 mm/sec, and for the PC‐receptors from 0·5 to 19·6 mm/sec. 6. The conduction velocities of the afferents were all in the A α—β range. For the RA‐receptors the conduction velocities ranged from 26 to 91 m/sec (mean = 55·3 ± 3·4), and for PC‐receptors the range was from 34 to 61 m/sec (mean = 46·9 ± 3·6). 7. The nerve impulse frequency as a function of indentation velocity was analysed for nineteen RA‐receptors and four PC‐receptors. A hyperbolic log tangent function of the type first introduced by Naka & Rushton (1966) in studies on S‐potentials in the fish retina was found to be the best description of the stimulus—response function for sixteen RA‐receptors and two PC‐receptors. For the remaining units a pure logarithmic function was the best description. However, the logarithmic function may be, as found in the present study, a special case of the more general log tanh function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks
Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2621 · Cited by 2,063
Abraira, V. E., & Ginty, D. D. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.051 · Cited by 1,648
Johansson, R. S., & Vallbo, A. B. (1979) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619 · Cited by 1,291
Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand
Johansson, R. S., & Vallbo, Å. B. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90011-5 · Cited by 680
Johansson, R. S. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012411 · Cited by 430
Metadata
- Authors
- Knibestöl, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-08
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-452
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2079484278
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010279
- The paper
- Knibestöl, M. (1973). Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.