Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina

Open access
Cleland, B. G., Levick, W. R.·1974·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Nine hundred and sixty cat retinal ganglion cells were evaluated with respect to receptive‐field organization and latency to antidromic activation of their axons from optic‐tract and mid‐brain positions. 2. The vast majority (92%) had the familiar concentric centre/surround organization. As in earlier work these could be classed as sustained or transient, independently of the centre type. About 13% of the concentric cells were characterized by relatively sluggish responses to conventional visual stimuli which yielded brisk responses from the others. The sluggish cells constituted a previously unspecified class of concentric receptive fields. 3. The responses of brisk and sluggish cells to a variety of stimuli were described with a view to developing procedures for distinguishing them on functional grounds. 4. Measurements of latency to antidromic activation of retinal axons confirmed earlier work in showing that cells classed as brisk‐transient had the shortest conduction times from the optic tract. Cells classed as brisk‐sustained had intermediate conduction times and from earlier work would constitute an important input to the lateral geniculate nucleus. A proportion of the brisk‐sustained axons reached the pretectal region (especially on‐centre types) and a small minority reached the superior colliculus (especially off‐centre types). 5. Sluggish cells had generally slower antidromic conduction times; despite some overlap with the brisk‐sustained class, the slower conduction provided independent support for the functional differentiation. Sluggish axons reached the pretectal region and superior colliculus. 6. The brisk‐sustained cells constituted the majority of the recordings in the area centralis. 7. A comparison with the morphological data of Boycott & Wässle is made which suggests that the brisk‐transient units corresponded with α cells, the brisk‐sustained with β cells, and the sluggish units were included amongst the γ cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010617

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Cleland, B. G., & Levick, W. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-07
Volume
240
Issue
2
Pages
421-456
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2009193989
Cited by
487
References
3
FWCI
17.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010617
The paper
Cleland, B. G., & Levick, W. R. (1974). Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010617

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.