The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat.
Open accessAbstract
We have studied the neuronal circuitry and structure‐function relationships of single neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat using a combination of electrophysiological and anatomical techniques. Glass micropipettes filled with horseradish peroxidase were used to record extracellularly from single neurones. After studying the receptive field properties, the afferent inputs of the neurones were studied by determining their latency of response to electrical stimulation at different positions along the optic pathway. Some cells were thus classified as receiving a mono‐ or polysynaptic input from afferents of the lateral geniculate nucleus (l.g.n.), via X‐ or Y‐like retinal ganglion cells. Two striking correlations were found between dendritic morphology and receptive field type. All spiny stellate cells, and all star pyramidal cells in layer 4A, had receptive fields with spatially separate on and off subfields (S‐type receptive fields). All the identified afferent input to these, the major cell types in layer 4, was monosynaptic from X‐ or Y‐like afferents. Neurones receiving monosynaptic X‐ or Y‐like input were not strictly segregated in layer 4 and the lower portion of layer 3. Nevertheless the X‐ and Y‐like l.g.n. fibres did not converge on any of the single neurones so far studied. Monosynaptic input from the l.g.n. afferents was not restricted to cells lying within layers 4 and 6, the main termination zones of the l.g.n. afferents, but was also received by cells lying in layers 3 and 5. The projection pattern of cells receiving monosynaptic input differed widely, depending on the laminar location of the cell soma. This suggests the presence of a number of divergent paths within the striate cortex. Cells receiving indirect input from the l.g.n. afferents were located mainly within layers 2, 3 and 5. Most pyramidal cells in layer 3 had axons projecting out of the striate cortex, while many axons of the layer 5 pyramids did not. The layer 5 cells showed the most morphological variation of any layer, were the most difficult to activate by electrical stimulation, and contained some cells which responded with the longest latencies of any cells in the striate cortex. This suggests that they were several synapses distant from the l.g.n. input. The majority of cells in layers 2, 3, 4 and 6 had the same basic S‐type receptive field structure. Only layer 5 contained a majority of cells with spatially overlapping on and off subfields (C‐ and B‐type receptive fields).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1963) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079 · Cited by 834
Effects of sleep and arousal on the processing of visual information in the cat
Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/291554a0 · Cited by 583
Somogyi, P., Kisvárday, Z. F., Martin, K. A. C., & Whitteridge, D. (1983) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(83)90133-1 · Cited by 423
Self-citationOrdinal position and afferent input of neurons in monkey striate cortex
Bullier, J., & Henry, G. H. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901930407 · Cited by 99
Cited by
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system
Markram, H., Toledo-Rodriguez, M., Wang, Y., Gupta, A., Silberberg, G., & Wu, C. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1519 · Cited by 2,954
Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex
Gray, C. M., & Singer, W. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.5.1698 · Cited by 2,463
CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps
Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149 · Cited by 2,083
NEURONAL CIRCUITS OF THE NEOCORTEX
Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152 · Cited by 1,886
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, K. A., & Whitteridge, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 353
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 463-504
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2056934252
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015347
- The paper
- Martin, K. A., & Whitteridge, D. (1984). Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.