The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors
Open accessAbstract
1. In turtle cones the steady‐state relation between the internal potential and log light intensity was much flatter in the steady state than it was at 30 msec after the beginning of a step of light; this is attributed to a desensitization which develops with a delay of 50–100 msec. 2. When a weak flash was superposed on a steady background light which hyperpolarized the cone by 3‐6 mV the amplitude of the linear response to a flash was reduced to 1/e and the time to maximum was shortened from about 110 to 70 msec; the response also became diphasic. With stronger background lights the flash sensitivity continued to fall, but the time to maximum did not become shorter than 40–50 msec and lengthened again with very strong lights. 3. In cones the flash sensitivity SF was reduced to half its dark value SFD by a light intensity of 1/SFD ζ where ζ is about 20 sec/V. 4. At low levels of background light, about two‐thirds of the change in sensitivity was time‐dependent and one‐third was attributable to the ‘instantaneous non‐linearity’ described in the previous paper. 5. The reduction in time to peak and the decrease in sensitivity produced by a background light which hyperpolarized by about 3 mV was little affected by changing the diameter of the area illuminated from 12 to 800 μm. 6. An experiment with a rod showed that a very weak light which hyperpolarized by only 0·5 mV decreased the linear response to 1/e and shortened the time to maximum from 300 to 180 msec. 7. With weak or moderate flashes the time‐dependent desensitization lagged behind the potential by 50–100 msec. 8. The desensitization and shortening of time scale which persisted after a flash or step were associated with an after‐hyperpolarization. The relaxation of potential, sensitivity and time scale became slower as the preceding illumination was increased from 10 3 to 10 10 photons μm−2; the increase seemed to occur in steps involving components which relaxed with time constants of the order of 0·1, 1, 10 and 100 sec. A rebound phenomenon was observed after steps longer than 30 sec and with equivalent intensities greater than 10 5 photons μm−2 sec−1. 9. Several of the observations are explained by a hypothesis in which the central assumption is that the particles which block the ionic channels are degraded or removed by an autocatalytic reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemistry of Visual Adaptation in the Rat
DOWLING, J. E. (1960) · Nature · doi:10.1038/188114a0 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Sodium/Calcium Exchange: Its Physiological Implications
Blaustein, M. P., & Lederer, W. J. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.763 · Cited by 1,736
Visual transduction in cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.
Schnapf, J. L., Nunn, B. J., Meister, M., & Baylor, D. A. (1990) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018193 · Cited by 478
Self-citationThe electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light
Baylor, D. A., Hodgkin, A. L., & Lamb, T. D. (1974) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010731 · Cited by 469
Self-citationMeister, M., & Berry, M. J. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80700-x · Cited by 434
The Cone-specific visual cycle
Wang, J.-S., & Kefalov, V. J. (2011) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.11.001 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Baylor, D. A., & Hodgkin, A. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-11
- Volume
- 242
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 729-758
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2021062016
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732
- The paper
- Baylor, D. A., & Hodgkin, A. L. (1974). Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.