Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area.

Open access
Knibestöl, M·1975·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Single unit impluses were recorded from the ulnar and median nerves of awake human subjects with tungsten electrodes inserted percutaneously in the upper arm. 2. One hundred and one slowly adapting receptors with receptive fields in the glabrous skin area were studied. The units were classified as type SA‐I and type SA‐II largely on the basis of their responses to lateral stretching of the skin. Eighty‐eight receptors did not respond to this type of stimulus (type SA‐I), whereas thirteen receptors readily responded to stretching (type SA‐II), AND OFTEN EXHIBITED DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY. 3. The SA‐I receptors showed no spontaneous discharge, and the discharge pattern was mostly rather irregular, whereas most of the SA‐II receptors had a spontaneous discharge, and a very regular discharge pattern. 4. The conduction velocities of the afferent were all in a A alpha range. The mean value for the SA‐I receptors was 58‐7 plus or minus 2‐3m/sec, and for the SA‐II receptors 45.3 plus or minus 3.6 m/sec. 5. The neural response to stimuli of varying skin indentation amplitudes was analyzed. The threshold for a dynamic response ranged for the SA‐I receptors from 0.15 to 1.35 mm and for the SA‐II receptors from 0.25 to 0.95 mm. The threshold for a static discharge ranged for the SA‐I receptors from 0.25 to more than 2.0 mm and for the SA‐II receptors from 0.55 to 1.65 mm. 6. The stimulus‐response functions were analysed for 25 SA‐I receptors and 2 SA‐II receptors. A hyperbolic log tangent function was the best description when the neural response was defined as the total number of impluses evoked by a stimulus of 1 sec duration. When only the static part of this type of plot was analyzed, a power function was a very good description for many units, but other functions (linear, logarithmic exponential, log tanh) were equally good or better for many units. This was also the dase when the mean impulse frequency of the sustained discharge was defined as a measure of the neural response. These two latter types of plots were clearly negatively accelerating, the exponent of the power function being 0.66 (mean).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Knibestöl, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-02
Volume
245
Issue
1
Pages
63-80
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2415880730
Cited by
335
References
1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835
The paper
Knibestöl, M. (1975). Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.