The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detachment of structurally intact nerve endings from chromatolytic neurones of rat superior cervical ganglion during the depression of synaptic transmission induced by post‐ganglionic axotomy.
Open accessAbstract
1. Electrophysiological studies showed that injury of post‐ganglionic nerve fibres leads to severe and prolonged depression of synaptic transmission through the rat superior cervical ganglion, beginning within 24 h. This is in line with the results of previous studies in other species and upon other neurones. 2. electron microscopy after post‐ganglionic axotomy revealed nerve endings of presynaptic type with all the specialized membrane‐related features of a synaptic zone, but which were not apposed to any post‐synaptic nervous element. These umusual profiles were interpreted as detached presynaptic nerve endings. In normal and control ganglia, such profiles formed at most 0–5% of all vesicle‐containing profiles of presynaptic type; in ganglia with all major post‐ganglionic branches cut the proportion rose to approximately 7%, between 3 and 7 d post‐operatively. Over this period, the mean incidence of chromatolytic neurones was 74–6%. 3. Concomitantly, the incidence of synapses within the ganglion fell by about 75%, reaching its lowest levels between 3 and 7 d post‐operatively. There was strikingly little evidence of persistence of post‐synaptic membrane specializations (‘membrane thickenings’) following detachment of synapses. 4. At longer survival intervals the incidence of synapses gradually increased, and that of detached nerve endings gradually decreased; recovery was well advanced by 42 d. 5. The fall in the incidence of synapses was closely paralleled by a fall in the incidence of desmosome‐like attachments in the ganglion; the incidence of such attachments was found to be correlated to a significant degree with that of synapses. 6. It is concluded that most or all of the synapses upon sympathetic neurones become physically dissociated during the chromatolytic reaction of these neurones to axotomy. The failure to persist of ultrastructurally specialized post‐synaptic sites, and the loss of desmosomes (particularly marked for those involving purely post‐ganglionic nervous elements) suggest that the post‐ganglionic neurone is losing all its specializations for attachment. 7. Some evidence suggests that the satellite cells may effect the final separation between pre‐ and post‐synaptic structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Trophic Mechanisms in the Peripheral Nervous System
Varon, S. S., & Bunge, R. P. (1978) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.01.030178.001551 · Cited by 326
Lichtman, J. W. (1977) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012087 · Cited by 306
Popov, V. I., & Bocharova, L. S. (1992) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(92)90337-2 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, M. R., & Nelson, V. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-02
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-135
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2131209631
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detachment of structurally intact nerve endings from chromatolytic neurones of rat superior cervical ganglion during the depression of synaptic transmission induced by post‐ganglionic axotomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010837
- The paper
- Matthews, M. R., & Nelson, V. H. (1975). Detachment of structurally intact nerve endings from chromatolytic neurones of rat superior cervical ganglion during the depression of synaptic transmission induced by post‐ganglionic axotomy. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.