The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of immobilization and stretch on protein turnover of rat skeletal muscle.
Open accessAbstract
1. Changes in muscle size have been studied as a function of time after immobilization and in relation to the functional length of the muscle. 2. When immobilized in a shortened position the soleus and extensor digitorum longus muscles underwent atrophy, showing net losses of tissue protein. This atrophy appears to be caused by decreases in protein synthesis and increases in protein break‐down. Average rates of protein synthesis and degradation were measured in immobilized and unrestrained control muscles by sensitive in vitro methods. 3. When the two muscles were held in a lengthened position they grew compared with internal controls. This rapid growth was primarily due to increased rats of protein synthesis, which possibly arise from a more active involvement of ribosomes in translation. In keeping with these situations of growth, DNA synthesis, DNA and RNA concentrations were found to be higher in the immobilized tissues. 4. Passive stretch and the development of isometric tension via the stretch reflux are suggested as factors stimulating protein synthesis, and hence inducing the growth of muscles held in the lengthened state. Probably neither of these factors will be experienced appreciably in the shortened position of restraint, and the lower level of activity in these immobilized muscles leads to their atrophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sola, O. M., Christensen, D. L., & Martin, A. W. (1973) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(73)90182-9 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Free Radicals in the Physiological Control of Cell Function
Dröge, W. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2001 · Cited by 9,855
Role of Inactivity in Chronic Diseases: Evolutionary Insight and Pathophysiological Mechanisms
Booth, F. W., Roberts, C. K., Thyfault, J. P., Ruegsegger, G. N., & Toedebusch, R. G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2016 · Cited by 696
Mechanotransduction and the regulation of mTORC1 signaling in skeletal muscle
Hornberger, T. A. (2011) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2011.05.007 · Cited by 170
“Although mechanical stimuli have been shown to affect both of these processes, the primary effect of mechanical stimulation appears to occur at the level of translational efficiency (Kimball et al., 2002, Goldspink, 1977).”
BackgroundMechanotransduction and the regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle
Hornberger, T. A., & Esser, K. A. (2004) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2004357 · Cited by 102
Saini, K., Cho, S., Dooling, L. J., & Discher, D. E. (2020) · Matrix Biology · doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2019.06.001 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldspink, D. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-282
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2078160543
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.