Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The baroreceptor input to cardiac vagal motoneurones

Open access
McAllen, R. M., Spyer, K. M.·1978·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. A study has been made of twenty‐three cardiac vagal motoneurones (c.v.m.s) in the nucleus ambiguus of chloralose‐anaesthetized cats. 2. C.v.m.s were identified as described previously (McAllen & Spyer, 1978). They were either spontaneously active (five units) or induced to fire by the ionophoresis of DL‐homocysteic acid (DLH). Evidence is presented that above threshold, the DLH dose is not critical for the ability to show a baroreceptor influence. 3. The influence of the baroreceptors was determined by plotting pulse‐triggered histograms of c.v.m. activity. If the aortic baroreceptors were denervated, the pulse synchronous activity disappeared reversibly on carotid occlusion (eight out of eight cases). In five out of fifteen cells studied, when aortic baroreceptor pathways were intact, a small degree of cardiac modulation survived carotid occlusion. 4. Estimates of the central delay of the baroreceptor‐vagal reflex were made by timing the c.v.m. response to both electrical stimulation of the sinus nerve and natural baroreceptor stimulation. When both methods were used on individual units, electrical stimulation invariably gave shorter values. Natural stimulation gave values that fell into two ranges (20‐60 msec and 70‐110 msec), suggesting the involvement of two pathways. 5. Using higher currents, four c.v.m.s were induced to fire tonically during inspiration. Their activity in this phase showed a cardiac rhythm just as during expiration. Similarly, they responded to sinus nerve stimulation throughout the respiratory cycle. 6. This result is discussed in relation to the observation of others that the baroreceptor‐cardiac reflex is ineffective during inspiration. It is proposed that there is no need to invoke a ‘gate’ early in the pathway but that this phenomenon and the present observations are best explained by summation of influences at the c.v.m. cell membrane.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012469

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
McAllen, R. M., & Spyer, K. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-09
Volume
282
Issue
1
Pages
365-374
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2117084903
Cited by
185
References
1
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The baroreceptor input to cardiac vagal motoneurones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012469
The paper
McAllen, R. M., & Spyer, K. M. (1978). The baroreceptor input to cardiac vagal motoneurones. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.