The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve.
Open accessAbstract
1. Voltage‐clamp studies were carried out on single rabbit myelinated nerve fibres at 14 degrees C with the method of Dodge & Frankenhaeuser (1958). 2. A method was developed to allow the ionic currents through the modal membrane to be calibrated exactly under voltage‐clamp conditions by measuring the resistance of the internode through which the current was injected. 3. The ionic currents in a rabbit node of Ranvier can be resolved into two components, a sodium current and a leak current. Potassium current is almost entirely absent. 4. The sodium currents in rabbit nodes were fitted by the Hodgkin‐Huxley model using m2h kinetics. The kinetics of sodium currents in a rabbit node differ from that in a frog node under similar experimental conditions in two respects: (a) inactivation is faster, tau h for rabbit being 2‐3 times smaller around ‐50 mV; (b) the P(Na) (E) curve for mammal is shifted 10‐15 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction. 5. From the kinetics of sodium current, the non‐propagating rabbit action potential was reconstructed at 14 degrees C. The transient inward sodium current is responsible for the fast initial depolarization phase of the action potential, while the repolarizing phase is accounted for by leak alone. The computed shape of the action potential was in good agreement with the experimentally obtained action potential. 6. At 14 degrees C, frog and rabbit nodes with similar diameters have similar measured gNa values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols
Merrill, D. R., Bikson, M., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020 · Cited by 2,078
The energetics of CNS white matter
Harris, J. J., & Attwell, D. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3430-11.2012 · Cited by 505
Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation
Rattay, F. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.32099 · Cited by 420
Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve
Mogyoros, I., Kiernan, M. C., & Burke, D. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.439 · Cited by 358
Rat optic nerve: electrophysiological, pharmacological and anatomical studies during development
Foster, R. E., Connors, B. W., & Waxman, S. G. (1982) · Developmental Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0165-3806(82)90005-0 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiu, S. Y., Ritchie, J. M., Rogart, R. B., & Stagg, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-166
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2021706887
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012843
- The paper
- Chiu, S. Y., Ritchie, J. M., Rogart, R. B., & Stagg, D. (1979). A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.