Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective antagonism of amino acid‐induced and synaptic excitation in the cat spinal cord.

Open access
Davies, J, Watkins, J C·1979·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The effects of D‐alpha‐aminoadipate (DalphaAA), D‐alpha‐aminosuberate (DalphaAS) and other excitatory amino acid antagonists have been compared on the excitatory responses of neurones of the cat spinal cord to acetylcholine, a range of glutamate‐related amino acids and stimulation of appropriate excitatory synaptic pathways. The ionophoretic technique was used for administration of excitants and antagonists. 2. DalphaAA and DalphaAS had little or no effect on acetylcholine‐induced excitation of Renshaw cells. Responses of either Renshaw cells or dorsal horn neurones in the spinal cord to excitatory amino acids were depressed in the order: N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA), L‐homocysteate, D‐glutamate, ibotenate greater than D‐homocysteate, L‐aspartate, D‐aspartate greater than L‐glutamate, kainate and quisqualate. 3. These effects are consistent with the existence of different excitatory amino acid receptors, one type being sensitive to the actions of the antagonists, and activated predominantly by the NMDA group of excitants, with other receptors being relatively insensitive to DalphaAA and DalphaAS and activated predominantly by quisqualate and kainate. On this hypothesis, many amino acids are assumed to have mixed actions on DalphaAA‐sensitive and ‐insensitive receptors. 4. 2‐Amino‐4‐phosphonobutyrate (2APB) and L‐glutamic acid diethyl ester (GDEE) produced different patterns of antagonism of excitatory amino acid‐induced responses from those observed with DalphaAA and DalphaAS. Neither substance was as potent as DalphaAA or DalphaAS as an excitatory amino acid antagonist. 5. Both DalphaAA and DalphaAS selectively antagonized synaptic excitation of Renshaw cells evoked by dorsal root stimulation without affecting cholinergic excitation of these cells evoked by ventral root stimulation. These latter responses were selectively antagonized by dihydro‐beta‐erythroidine (DHbetaE). DalphaAA also antagonized synaptic excitation of unidentified dorsal horn neurones of the spinal cord evoked by dorsal root stimulation. Neither GDEE (particularly) nor 2APB were as effective as DalphaAA or DalphaAS as depressants of synaptic excitation. 6. Taken in conjunction with the results of in vitro studies on the specificity of action of Dalpha¿ and related substances, these observations suggest that certain synaptic excitations in the spinal cord are mediated by an excitatory amino acid transmitter, and that this transmitter interacts with receptors which are activated selectively by NMDA, less selectively by other amino acids, including L‐aspartate, and probably only slightly by quisqualate, kainate and (exogenous) L‐glutamate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013060

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Davies, J., & Watkins, J. C.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-12
Volume
297
Issue
1
Pages
621-635
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2069378476
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective antagonism of amino acid‐induced and synaptic excitation in the cat spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013060
The paper
Davies, J., & Watkins, J. C. (1979). Selective antagonism of amino acid‐induced and synaptic excitation in the cat spinal cord. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.