Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Potential clamp analysis of membrane currents in rat myelinated nerve fibres.

Open access
Brismar, T·1980·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Large myelinated nerve fibres were isolated from rats and the membrane action potential was recorded in single nodes of Ranvier. Potential clamp experiments were performed at 24 degrees C and in one fibre also at 33 degrees C. 2. Positive potential steps were associated with an initial, mainly Na carried, current with an equilibrium potential (Ue) of 40 +/‐ 13 mV. The INa vs. U curve showed rectification at large positive potentials. 3. The Na permeability (PNa) curve was characteristically S‐shaped with a half value at ‐48 +/‐ 6 mV and a ceiling value of 3.7 +/‐ 0.7 cm.sec‐1.10(‐3). PNa as defined by the constant field equation accounted for the rectification of the INa/U curve. 4. The potential and time dependence of the rapid inactivation (h) process was described quantitatively in terms of its steady state (h infinity) vs. U curve and its rate constants (alpha h and beta h) vs. U curves. h infinity (U = ‐80 mV) was 0.68 +/‐ 0.09. 5. The delayed currents were small and the ionic specificity of the delayed permeability changes was not identified. Tentatively calculated PK at large potentials was 0.21 +/‐ 0.06 cm.sec‐1.10(‐3). The leak conductance (gL) was 130 +/‐ 33 mS.cm‐2. 6. A temperature rise in one experiment from 24 to 33 degrees C increased the rate constants (alpha h and beta h), but did not significantly change the size of the delayed currents. 7. INa was completely blocked by 25 nM‐TTX in the outside solution. External application of 5 mM‐TEA only slowly and incompletely blocked the small delayed currents. This effect was not fully reversible. 8. A comparison with frog fibres showed that the node in rat fibres had (a) a lower Ue of the initial current (probably because of a lower Na selectivity of the channel for the initial current), (b) approximately equal max. peak PNa, (c) about 10 mV negatively shifted PNa vs. U and h infinity vs. U curves, (d) quantitatively similar relations between rate constants of inactivation (alpha h and beta h) and U at 20‐‐24 degrees C, (e) PK that was 1/5 of PK in frog fibres, (f) 4‐‐5 times larger leak conductance, (g) membrane action potentials of smiliar amplitude and duration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013074

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Brismar, T.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-01
Volume
298
Issue
1
Pages
171-184
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2132210863
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential clamp analysis of membrane currents in rat myelinated nerve fibres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013074
The paper
Brismar, T. (1980). Potential clamp analysis of membrane currents in rat myelinated nerve fibres. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.