Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle

Open access
Crawford, A. C., Fettiplace, R.·1980·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The electrical responses of single auditory nerve fibres or cochlear hair cells were recorded in the isolated half‐head of the turtle Pseudemys scripta elegans. Responses to sound stimuli presented to the tympanum could be recorded for at least 4 hr after isolation. 2. Impulses were recorded extracellularly from single auditory nerve fibres. For tones of suprathreshold intensity the impulses occurred with a preferred phase relation (i.e. they were phase‐locked) to the cycles of the sound stimulus. Nerve fibres had sharp tuning curves (Q10 db = 0·5‐7·5) with single characteristic frequencies (c.f.) ranging from about 30 to 700 Hz. Best threshold sensitivities of fibres at their c.f. were in the region of 30‐40 db sound pressure level with respect to 20 μPa. 3. Intracellular recordings were made from hair cells in the basilar papilla. Following injection of a fluorescent dye into a cell through the recording electrode, the dye was localized in a single hair cell in a transverse section of the cochlea. 4. Hair cells had resting potentials of about ‐50 mV, and, to low frequency tones, gave periodic responses graded with the intensity and frequency of the stimulus. Recordings were obtained from cells with characteristic frequencies between 70 and 670 Hz. 5. The voltage response to a pure tone at low sound pressure was sinusoidal for all frequencies of stimulation; at higher sound pressures a number of non‐linearities were apparent in the response wave form. One of these was a steady depolarizing component, which, relative to the periodic component of the response, was most prominent at high frequencies. 6. The amplitude of the response evoked in a hair cell by a low intensity tone was linearly related to the sound pressure; for loud sounds, the response eventually reached a saturating amplitude, which in some cells was as great as 30‐45 mV peak‐to‐peak. 7. The linear sensitivity of a hair cell is defined as the r.m.s. voltage for a linear response of the cell at its c.f. divided by the sound pressure at the tympanum. In the most sensitive cells this value was 30‐90 mV/Pa. 8. If the frequency selectivity of a hair cell was expressed in terms of the sound pressure needed to produce a constant amplitude of response, the sharpness of this frequency selectivity was found to be virtually independent of the response criterion for responses between 1 and 10 mV; in the cells which gave the largest responses, the frequency selectivity expressed in this way was comparable to that of the nerve fibres. Cells with smaller maximum responses often had broader tuning curves. 9. Responses of hair cells to short low intensity tone bursts at the c.f. built up approximately exponentially during the tone, and decayed away exponentially when the tone was terminated. The terminal oscillations were at the c.f. of the cell, and independent of the frequency of stimulation. 10. From the time constant of the build up and decay of the linear response to a tone burst at the c.f. the sharpness of tuning of the cell was estimated and found to agree with that obtained from the responses of the cell to continuous tones. The most highly tuned cells had quality factors (Q3 db) in the range 5‐10. 11. The c.f. of a hair cell was correlated with its position along the basilar membrane. Low frequency hair cells were located towards the apical or lagenar end and high frequency cells were found towards the basal or saccular end. On the assumption of an exponential distribution of c.f. with distance, each octave occupied about 94 μm along the membrane. 12. A hair cell's response to a click was a decaying oscillation at the characteristic frequency of the cell. From the initial polarity of the responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks it was concluded that the hair cell depolarized as a result of movements of the basilar membrane towards the scala vestibuli, and hyperpolarized for motion towards the scala tympani. 13. In the absence of deliberate sound stimulation, the hair cell voltage fluctuated continuously about its mean level. The principal frequency components in the noise were concentrated around the c.f. of the cell. The voltage noise in the hair cells showed no significant cross‐correlation with sound pressure fluctuations at the tympanum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013387

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Crawford, A. C., & Fettiplace, R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-09
Volume
306
Issue
1
Pages
79-125
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2072185811
Cited by
245
References
0
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013387
The paper
Crawford, A. C., & Fettiplace, R. (1980). The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.