Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments.

Open access
Baylor, D A, Matthews, G, Yau, K W·1980·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Physiological noise in the visual transduction mechanism was studied by recording membrane current from single rod outer segments in pieces of isolated toad retina. 2. The inward current in darkness showed spontaneous fluctuations which disappeared during the response to bright light. 3. The dark noise consisted of two components, a continuous fluctuation of rms amplitude about 0.2 pA and occasional discrete events about 1 pA in size. 4. Intervals between discrete events followed the exponential distribution expected of a Poisson process with a mean rate of about one event per 50 sec (20 degrees C). 5. The amplitude and power spectrum of the discrete events resembled those of single photon effects in the same rod, suggesting that discrete events may arise from spontaneous activation of single rhodopsin molecules. 6. The temperature dependence of the mean frequency of occurrence of discrete events gave an activation energy of 22 kcal mole‐1, probably characteristic of thermal isomerization of rhodopsin. 7. The variance of the continuous component of the dark noise rose linearly with the length of the outer segment drawn into the suction electrode, indicating that this component is generated in the outer segment. 8. The power spectrum of a rod's continuous noise was usually fitted by the square of a Lorentzian with the same time constant as that of the four first‐order delays in the cell's single photon response. The shot effects composing the continuous component thus appear to be shaped by two of four sequential processes in transduction. 9. The variance and spectrum of the continuous noise are interpreted to reflect shot effects about 1/400 the size of a single photon effect occurring at a frequency of 6 x 10(3) sec‐1. 10. The rod's flash sensitivity was halved by a steady light to giving about 8 photoisomerizations sec‐1. The much lower mean rate of discrete events indicates that Io in increment sensitivity experiments on individual receptors is not set by thermal activation of rhodopsin. 11. Values of sensitivity and time‐to‐peak flash response collected from many cells in darkness were correlated by the same power law relation obtaining in the presence of backgrounds. The correlation observed would be explained if a single variable controlled both the gain and time scale of several stages of the transduction mechanism in background light and in darkness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Baylor, D. A., Matthews, G., & Yau, K. W.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-12
Volume
309
Issue
1
Pages
591-621
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2029711851
Cited by
468
References
1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529
The paper
Baylor, D. A., Matthews, G., & Yau, K. W. (1980). Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.