Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments

Open access
Lamb, T. D., McNaughton, P. A., Yau, K.-W.·1981·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The spread of activation and background desensitization in rods was studied by recording membrane current from single outer segments in pieces of isolated toad retina. 2. Flash sensitivity changed slightly along the outer segment, falling by about 30% from base to tip. 3. When only the distal half of an outer segment was in the recording pipette, illumination of the unrecorded part elicited little or no photocurrent at the recorded part, indicating that a photoisomerization does not cause activation of the entire outer segment. 4. With diffuse illumination of an outer segment fully drawn into the pipette, the intensity—response relations at fixed times were invariant in form for most of the rising phase of the flash response and were considerably steeper than the Michaelis relation. The observed relation was consistent with a model in which a photoisomerization blocks all channels over a short region of the outer segment. 5. With illumination restricted to a narrow transverse slit, the intensity—response relations at fixed times were much less steep, as would be expected for a very limited longitudinal spread of activation. An upper limit for the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient of the internal transmitter was estimated to be about 3 × 10−7 cm 2 sec−1. This corresponds to a space constant for longitudinal spread of transmitter of about 3 μm at the time of the dim response peak. 6. The time course of flash responses elicited with light positioned either on the edge or on the centre of the outer segment was very similar. 7. Desensitization resulting from steady illumination by a transverse slit was also localized longitudinally. A linear desensitization parameter T, defined in Results, decayed approximately exponentially along the outer segment, on either side of the site of photoisomerization, with a space constant of about 6 μm. 8. Transverse spread of desensitization was more effective than longitudinal spread. 9. After turning off a dim diffuse background light, the decay of T was roughly exponential with a time constant of several seconds. From this, and the steady state space constant of 6 μm, it is estimated that the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient for a ‘desensitizing substance’ would also be about 10−7 cm 2 sec−1. 10. The restricted longitudinal spread of activation and desensitization may be explained by the barrier to diffusion presented by the stacked membranous disks in the outer segment. This baffling reduces the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient to about 1/50 that of ordinary aqueous diffusion, but it does not significantly affect transverse spread.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Lamb, T. D., McNaughton, P. A., & Yau, K.-W.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-10
Volume
319
Issue
1
Pages
463-496
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2047057288
Cited by
291
References
1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921
The paper
Lamb, T. D., McNaughton, P. A., & Yau, K.-W. (1981). Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.