The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Responses of cat corneal sensory receptors to mechanical and thermal stimulation.
Open accessAbstract
1. The afferent responses evoked by mechanical and thermal stimulation of the cat cornea were recorded extracellularly from strands of long and mixed ciliary nerves under deep anaesthesia. 94% of the units studied (n = 53) responded consistently to both stimuli. 2. Conduction velocities, measured by electrical stimulation of the receptive field, corresponded to the lower range of the A‐delta fibre group (average = 5.4 m/sec). Receptive fields covered approximately a quadrant of the corneal surface and showed continuous sensitivity and overlapping. Units were silent in the absence of stimulation but an ongoing activity was commonly present after repeated mechanical and thermal stimulation. 3. Mechanical responses were evoked at low thresholds and consisted of a dynamic and static response that paralleled the amplitude of the stimulus. The pattern of the discharge was irregular and fatigue was easily developed by repeated stimulation. 4. Thresholds to heating were above 38 degrees C and the response increased monotonically with the temperature over the range from threshold to 50 degrees C. The heat response could be sensitized by repeated long suprathreshold stimulation while variable changes in the response were induced by briefer stimuli. Also depression was observed in some circumstances. A weak response to cooling was present in 50% of the units tested. 5. Damaging mechanical stimulation or the application of a strong acid solution evoked a vigorous response followed by an earlier discharge that persisted for hours. 6. The relation of these receptors to other polymodal nociceptors and corneal sensation is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vellani, V., Mapplebeck, S., Moriondo, A., Davis, J. B., & McNaughton, P. A. (2001) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00813.x · Cited by 488
Zhang, X., Levy, D., Noseda, R., Kainz, V., Jakubowski, M., & Burstein, R. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0511-10.2010 · Cited by 408
Dua, H. S., Said, D. G., Messmer, E. M., Rolando, M., Benitez-del-Castillo, J. M., Hossain, P. N., Shortt, A. J., Geerling, G., Nubile, M., Figueiredo, F. C., et al. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.003 · Cited by 404
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease
Cruzat, A., Qazi, Y., & Hamrah, P. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.004 · Cited by 364
Malick, A., Strassman, R. M., & Burstein, R. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.4.2078 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Belmonte, C., & Giraldez, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 355-368
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2027456994
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of cat corneal sensory receptors to mechanical and thermal stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013989
- The paper
- Belmonte, C., & Giraldez, F. (1981). Responses of cat corneal sensory receptors to mechanical and thermal stimulation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.