The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The action of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid on mouse spinal neurones in culture.
Open accessAbstract
Neurones from the ventral half of mouse embryo spinal cord were grown in dissociated culture and voltage clamped. The current‐voltage relation of responses evoked by N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid (NMDA), L‐glutamic acid and kainic acid was recorded in media of different ionic composition. On removal of Mg2+ from the extracellular solution, responses to NMDA and L‐glutamate became less voltage sensitive, such that NMDA responses were no longer associated with a region of negative slope conductance. The antagonism of NMDA responses produced by application of Mg2+ to neurones bathed in nominally Mg2+‐free solutions shows voltage dependence and uncompetitive kinetics. Voltage‐jump experiments showed that the voltage‐dependent action of Mg2+ occurred rapidly, and with complex kinetics. Ni2+ and Cd2+, two potent blockers of calcium currents in spinal cord neurones, had significantly different potencies as NMDA antagonists, Ni2+ being of greater potency than Mg2+, and Cd2+ considerably weaker. The voltage‐dependent block of NMDA responses produced by physiological concentrations of Mg2+ is sufficient to explain the apparent increase in membrane resistance produced by NMDA in current‐clamp experiments, and the ability of NMDA to support repetitive firing. Substitution of choline for Na+ produced a hyperpolarizing shift in the reversal potential for responses evoked by kainic acid consistent with an increase in permeability to Na+ and K+. In choline‐substituted solutions, the reversal potential of NMDA responses was more positive than that recorded for kainic acid, and in addition NMDA responses showed enhanced desensitization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MacDermott, A. B., Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., Smith, S. J., & Barker, J. L. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321519a0 · Cited by 1,835
Self-citationA mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory.
Lisman, J. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9574 · Cited by 1,127
Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system
Ozawa, S., Kamiya, H., & Tsuzuki, K. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00085-3 · Cited by 1,122
Mayer, M. L., & Westbrook, G. L. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016883 · Cited by 931
Self-citationAscher, P., & Nowak, L. (1988) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017078 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, M. L., & Westbrook, G. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-90
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2069713657
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The action of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid on mouse spinal neurones in culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015633
- The paper
- Mayer, M. L., & Westbrook, G. L. (1985). The action of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid on mouse spinal neurones in culture. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.