Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The vestibulo‐ocular reflex during human saccadic eye movements.

Open access
Laurutis, V P, Robinson, D A·1986·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Eye and head movements were recorded in normal humans during rapid refixations with the head still (saccades) or moving (gaze saccades) to determine if the vestibulo‐ocular reflex was operating at such times. Subjects made self‐electrooculogram for large saccades and with the eyecoil/magnetic field method for smaller movements. The putative function of the vestibulo‐ocular reflex during a gaze saccade is to adjust the movement of the eye for the movement of the head by adding the saccadic command and the vestibular signal. This action, referred to here as linear summation, would maintain gaze‐saccade accuracy by making gaze velocity (eye in space) independent of head velocity. It would also preserve the duration of the eye saccades of about 200 deg. When a subject increased his head velocity voluntarily, for example, from 420 to 805 deg/s, mean gaze velocity rose from 540 to 820 deg/s and duration dropped from 380 to 250 ms. Linear summation did not occur. By means of a yoke clenched in the teeth, the subject's head could be momentarily and unexpectedly slowed by collision of the yoke with a lead weight during a 180 deg gaze saccade. The perturbation decreased head velocity by about 150‐200 deg/s, decreased gaze velocity by about the same amount and did not change eye velocity (in the head); another indication that the vestibulo‐ocular reflex was not working. Nevertheless, gaze‐saccade duration was automatically increased so that the over‐all accuracy of the movement was not changed. Subjects made saccades between targets at +/‐ 20 deg without attempted head movements. Simultaneously the experimenter struck the yoke, clenched in the subject's teeth, with a rubber hammer. The hammer blow caused a transient head velocity of about 70 deg/s. Gaze velocity transiently rose or fell, depending on the direction of the blow, by similar amounts and a quantitative analysis suggested that the vestibulo‐ocular reflex was essentially absent. Again, duration was automatically altered so that saccade accuracy was not changed. Subjects looked back and forth between targets 20, 40 and 60 deg apart as their head turned through the straight ahead position, actively or passively, at velocities up to 600 deg/s (active) or 300 deg/s (passive).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Laurutis, V. P., & Robinson, D. A.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-04
Volume
373
Issue
1
Pages
209-233
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2004609551
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The vestibulo‐ocular reflex during human saccadic eye movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016043
The paper
Laurutis, V. P., & Robinson, D. A. (1986). The vestibulo‐ocular reflex during human saccadic eye movements. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.