Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paired recordings from supraoptic and paraventricular oxytocin cells in suckled rats: recruitment and synchronization.

Open access
Belin, V, Moos, F·1986·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Oxytocin cells in the paraventricular (p.v.) and contralateral supraoptic (s.o.) nuclei were pair‐recorded (with two micro‐electrodes) in suckled rats after being anaesthetized with urethane (1.2 g/kg), to study the synchronization of their neurosecretory bursts, the importance of cell recruitment and their firing characteristics. The synchronization of paired bursts was determined by measuring the onset time‐lag (time in milliseconds between the onset of two corresponding bursts) and the maximum firing time‐lag (time in milliseconds between the two shortest interspike intervals for the corresponding bursts). For each cell, the characteristics studied were: the background activity and the frequency and amplitude (total number of spikes) of the neurosecretory bursts. All paired p.v.‐s.o. cells recorded were activated simultaneously 12‐18 s before each milk ejection. The onset of a burst could vary either way, up to 680 ms, in relation to the other (mean onset time‐lag was 206 +/‐ 18 ms; n = 85) but the maximum activation periods fitted more closely, the mean maximum firing time‐lag being 122 +/‐ 14 ms (n = 64). Both parameters varied randomly, in duration and order from one pair of cells to another, from one pair of bursts to another for successive bursts of a given pair of cells and independently, whether the cells were in the p.v. or the s.o. nucleus. However, in most cases, the neurosecretory burst with the highest amplitude began and reached its peak firing rate before the corresponding burst from the other cell. Cell recruitment was observed when the milk ejection reflex began, for both the p.v. and the s.o. cells. The bursts of the non‐responsive cells developed progressively with the reflex, but, as soon as a cell was recruited, all its successive bursts were simultaneous with those of the first‐recruited oxytocin cells. During a regular pattern of milk ejections, the mean background activity of sixty p.v. cells (3.1 +/‐ 0.2 spikes/s) was significantly higher than that of their s.o. counterparts (1.9 +/‐ 0.2 spikes/s). Nevertheless, the mean amplitude of the neurosecretory bursts of the sixty p.v. cells (49 +/‐ 3 spikes) did not differ significantly from that of their s.o. counterparts (55 +/‐ 4 spikes).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016192

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Belin, V, & Moos, F.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-08
Volume
377
Issue
1
Pages
369-390
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2147829257
Cited by
163
References
3
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paired recordings from supraoptic and paraventricular oxytocin cells in suckled rats: recruitment and synchronization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016192
The paper
Belin, V, & Moos, F. (1986). Paired recordings from supraoptic and paraventricular oxytocin cells in suckled rats: recruitment and synchronization. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.