Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complex spikes in Purkinje cells in the lateral vermis (b zone) of the cat cerebellum during locomotion.

Open access
Andersson, G, Armstrong, D M·1987·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Complex spikes (c.s.s) due to climbing fibre input were recorded from forty‐one Purkinje cells in the lateral part of the vermis (i.e. the b zone) of lobule V of the cerebellum in cats walking on a moving belt or a horizontal ladder. Most cells were near the tips of the folia making up the lobule and some were shown by antidromic invasion to project to the ipsilateral lateral vestibular nucleus. In all cells c.s.s. could be evoked through mechanical stimuli delivered manually to the neck and/or trunk and/or the limb girdles and/or the proximal parts of the limbs. 2. During walking c.s.s. occurred at rates which ranged in different cells from 0.8 to 2.55/s (i.e. ca. 0.8 to 2/step). When activity was averaged across many successive steps the probability of c.s. occurrence was never completely constant throughout the step cycle, but no tendency was detected for c.s.s to recur at any precisely fixed time during the cycle. 3. When ladder locomotion was perturbed because a rung underwent an unexpected 2 cm descent when stepped on, some cells generated a c.s. at short latency in a proportion of trials. Such responses were well time‐locked to the onset of rung movement but not to its cessation (which they often preceded). 4. For perturbations of either forelimb the earliest displacement‐related c.s. occurred in different cells between 40 and 64 ms after the onset of rung movement. In different cells c.s.s occurred in from one out of five to three out of four perturbed steps (mean ca. two out of five steps). Eight out of seventeen cells responded to perturbation of the forelimb ipsilateral to the cell and five out of ten responded to contralateral perturbations. 5. Perturbation of the ipsilateral hind limb was accompanied by c.s.s in four out of nine cells and latency was usually longer (by ca. 30‐40 ms). One cell showed a decrease in the probability of c.s. occurrence. Insufficient data were obtained for a systematic study of responsiveness to perturbation of the contralateral hind limb. 6. Cells showed different patterns of limb specificity, responding to perturbation of one, two or all of the three limbs studied. In total, c.s.s accompanied perturbation of at least one limb in thirteen out of twenty cells studied (65%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016487

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Andersson, G., & Armstrong, D. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-04
Volume
385
Issue
1
Pages
107-134
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2144739941
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex spikes in Purkinje cells in the lateral vermis (b zone) of the cat cerebellum during locomotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016487
The paper
Andersson, G., & Armstrong, D. M. (1987). Complex spikes in Purkinje cells in the lateral vermis (b zone) of the cat cerebellum during locomotion. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016487

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.