Cited by 2,260Motor Control and AdaptationEmbodied and Extended CognitionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control

Miall, R.C., Wolpert, D.M.·1996·Neural Networks

Abstract

Based on theoretical and computational studies it has been suggested that the central nervous system (CNS) internally simulates the behaviour of the motor system in planning, control and learning. Such an internal "forward" model is a representation of the motor system that uses the current state of the motor system and motor command to predict the next state. We will outline the uses of such internal models for solving several fundamental computational problems in motor control and then review the evidence for their existence and use by the CNS. Finally we speculate how the location of an internal model within the CNS may be identified. Copyright 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forward models can help embodied agents to estimate and adjust the positions of their effectors in the course of action, by providing a representation of the expected position at each moment.

    “In particular, forward models can help embodied agents to estimate and adjust the positions of their effectors in the course of action, by providing a representation of the expected position at each moment.”

    From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Miall & Wolpert 1996

  • Brain loops might extend beyond the striatum and include the cerebellum, which has been assumed to encode a large repertoire of internal models required to predict and control action and its timing.

    “Brain loops might extend beyond the striatum and include, for example, the cerebellum, which – given its remarkably homogenous microarchitecture – has been often assumed to be able to encode a large repertoire of internal (generative) models required to predict and control action and its timing (Caligiore et al., 2013, Imamizu et al., 2003, Miall and Wolpert, 1996, Wolpert et al., 1998).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Miall and Wolpert, 1996

  • A forward internal model predicts the consequences of motor actions given the motor command and current sensory information as inputs.

    “With the motor command and current sensory information as its inputs, a forward internal model predicts the consequences of motor actions (Jordan and Rumelhart, 1992; Miall et al., 1993; Miall and Wolpert, 1996).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Miall and Wolpert, 1996

  • For an effector forward model, both the prediction and the sensory feedback are expressed in the effector kinematics space.

    “For an effector forward model, both the prediction and the sensory feedback are thought to be expressed in the effector kinematics space (Wolpert et al., 1995; Miall and Wolpert, 1996).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Miall and Wolpert, 1996

  • Efference copies' primary function is to predict, and often suppress, the sensory consequences of willed movements.

    “Their primary function is to predict, and often suppress, the sensory consequences of willed movements.”

    From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Wolpert and Miall, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Miall, R.C.
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
1265-1279
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081817157
Cited by
2,260
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 98
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
forward model, internal models, motor control, motor planning, motor learning, central nervous system, computational neuroscience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review