Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Action potential repolarization and a fast after‐hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Open access
Storm, J F·1987·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The repolarization of the action potential, and a fast after‐hyperpolarization (a.h.p.) were studied in CA1 pyramidal cells (n = 76) in rat hippocampal slices (28‐37 degrees C). Single spikes were elicited by brief (1‐3 ms) current pulses, at membrane potentials close to rest (‐60 to ‐70 mV). 2. Each action potential was followed by four after‐potentials: (a) the fast a.h.p., lasting 2‐5 ms; (b) an after‐depolarization; (c) a medium a.h.p., (50‐100 ms); and (d) a slow a.h.p. (1‐2 s). Both the fast a.h.p. and the slow a.h.p. (but not the medium a.h.p.) were inhibited by Ca2+‐free medium or Ca2+‐channel blockers (Co2+, Mn2+ or Cd2+); but tetraethylammonium (TEA; 0.5‐2 nM) blocked only the fast a.h.p., and noradrenaline (2‐5 microM) only the slow a.h.p. This suggests that two Ca2+‐activated K+ currents were involved: a fast, TEA‐sensitive one (IC) underlying the fast a.h.p., and a slow noradrenaline‐sensitive one (IAHP) underlying the slow a.h.p. 3. Like the fast a.h.p., spike repolarization seems to depend on a Ca2+‐dependent K+ current of the fast, TEA‐sensitive kind (IC). The repolarization was slowed by Ca2+‐free medium, Co2+, Mn2+, Cd2+, or TEA, but not by noradrenaline. Charybdotoxin (CTX; 30 nM), a scorpion toxin which blocks the large‐conductance Ca2+‐activated K+ channel in muscle, had a similar effect to TEA. The effects of TEA and Cd2+ (or Mn2+) showed mutual occlusion. Raising the external K+ concentration reduced the fast a.h.p. and slowed the spike repolarization, whereas Cl‐ loading of the cell was ineffective. 4. The transient K+ current, IA, seems also to contribute to spike repolarization, because: (a) 4‐aminopyridine (4‐AP; 0.1 mM), which blocks IA, slowed the spike repolarization; (b) depolarizing pre‐pulses, which inactivate IA, had a similar effect; (c) hyperpolarizing pre‐pulses speeded up the spike repolarization; (d) the effects of 4‐AP and pre‐pulses persisted during Ca2+ blockade (like IA); and (e) depolarizing pre‐pulses reduced the effect of 4‐AP. 5. Pre‐pulses or 4‐AP broadened the spike less, and in a different manner, than Ca2+‐free medium, Cd2+, Co2+, Mn2+, TEA or CTX. The former broadening was uniform, with little effect on the fast a.h.p., whereas the latter affected mostly the last two‐thirds of the spike repolarization and abolished the fast a.h.p.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016517

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 695

Metadata

Authors
Storm, J. F.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-04
Volume
385
Issue
1
Pages
733-759
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2119397841
Cited by
695
References
1
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action potential repolarization and a fast after‐hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016517
The paper
Storm, J. F. (1987). Action potential repolarization and a fast after‐hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.